Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20521–20530

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the petitioner failed to show a past history of achievement with influence on the field as a whole. Letters described local teaching strengths only; awards lacked more than local, regional, or institutional significance; and arguments about NCLBA do not create a blanket waiver for highly qualified foreign teachers.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner failed to show a past history of achievement with influence on the field as a whole. Letters described local teaching strengths only; awards lacked more than local, regional, or institutional significance; and arguments about NCLBA do not create a blanket waiver for highly qualified foreign teachers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-22_01_B5203; source_row=17535
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that physical education teaching is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that physical education teaching is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-22_01_B5203; source_row=17533
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the director's finding, citing the NYSDOT footnote that a single school teacher's impact in one school is not national in scope. AAO found no evidence that her work as a physical education teacher extends beyond her school.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding, citing the NYSDOT footnote that a single school teacher's impact in one school is not national in scope. AAO found no evidence that her work as a physical education teacher extends beyond her school.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-22_01_B5203; source_row=17534
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the petitioner's letters of support were conclusory, his publications after the filing date could not establish eligibility, his citation record (only two aggregate cites, one a self-cite, one post-filing) was insufficient, and his conference presentations lacked documentary evidence of impact on the field. The AAO affirmed the director's analysis as consistent with NYSDOT.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's letters of support were conclusory, his publications after the filing date could not establish eligibility, his citation record (only two aggregate cites, one a self-cite, one post-filing) was insufficient, and his conference presentations lacked documentary evidence of impact on the field. The AAO affirmed the director's analysis as consistent with NYSDOT.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=17532
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a surgeon is in an area of intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a surgeon is in an area of intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=17530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the petitioner's minimally invasive surgery research would be national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the petitioner's minimally invasive surgery research would be national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=17531
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that scientific conference presentations do not qualify as artistic exhibitions or showcases, which the longstanding interpretation limits to the visual arts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that scientific conference presentations do not qualify as artistic exhibitions or showcases, which the longstanding interpretation limits to the visual arts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-15_01_B2203; source_row=17514
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the record did not establish the petitioner's role as leading or critical to the organization as a whole, noting research projects were a small sample of nearly 400 underway, and that the regulation requires service for more than one organization, which was not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not establish the petitioner's role as leading or critical to the organization as a whole, noting research projects were a small sample of nearly 400 underway, and that the regulation requires service for more than one organization, which was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-15_01_B2203; source_row=17515
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the recommendation letters were vague, speculated about future impact rather than present influence, and lacked corroborating evidence of changes in surgical practice based on the petitioner's findings. Citation count was small and not reflective of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the recommendation letters were vague, speculated about future impact rather than present influence, and lacked corroborating evidence of changes in surgical practice based on the petitioner's findings. Citation count was small and not reflective of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-15_01_B2203; source_row=17512
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing EngineeringBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the record lacked sufficient evidence to compare the petitioner's contributions against other qualified workers. Most recognition came from within the petitioner's employer, independent citations were few, and no context was provided showing the petitioner's work distinguished him from peers.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked sufficient evidence to compare the petitioner's contributions against other qualified workers. Most recognition came from within the petitioner's employer, independent citations were few, and no context was provided showing the petitioner's work distinguished him from peers. The petitioner did not demonstrate his role was of sufficient national significance to warrant waiving the job offer requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-15_02_B5203; source_row=17529
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment