Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Petitioner submitted no prospective job letters, contracts, or detailed personal statement establishing intent to continue in clinical surgery research; current position is as surgical resident/fellow.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner submitted no prospective job letters, contracts, or detailed personal statement establishing intent to continue in clinical surgery research; current position is as surgical resident/fellow.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-15_01_B2203; source_row=17516 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree (or U.S. bachelor's plus 5 years progressive experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The pre-accreditation status was not received until November 2008, after the beneficiary's May 2008 degree, so the degree was awarded by an unaccredited institution and cannot qualify as a U.S. baccalaureate. The credentials evaluation using a 3-for-1 experience equivalency applies to H-1B, not to immigrant petitions, and the regulation does not permit equivalency for this category.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The pre-accreditation status was not received until November 2008, after the beneficiary's May 2008 degree, so the degree was awarded by an unaccredited institution and cannot qualify as a U.S. baccalaureate. The credentials evaluation using a 3-for-1 experience equivalency applies to H-1B, not to immigrant petitions, and the regulation does not permit equivalency for this category.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-14_02_B5203; source_row=17509 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets minimum educational requirements stated on ETA Form 9089
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's degree is in Biblical studies, not publishing or a related field as required by Part H of the labor certification, and the record does not establish equivalence to a master's in publishing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's degree is in Biblical studies, not publishing or a related field as required by Part H of the labor certification, and the record does not establish equivalence to a master's in publishing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-14_02_B5203; source_row=17510 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected the argument that scientific conference presentations qualify under criterion (vii), which is limited to the visual arts. The beneficiary is a surgeon, not a visual artist, and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the argument that scientific conference presentations qualify under criterion (vii), which is limited to the visual arts. The beneficiary is a surgeon, not a visual artist, and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B2203; source_row=17503 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest served to substantially greater degree than available U.S. workers
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the petitioner's record showed only local impact on her immediate school community and did not demonstrate a nationally significant influence on the field as a whole. The employer's debarment from sponsoring visas does not constitute grounds for a waiver, other schools could petition on her behalf, and mere competence and local recognition are insufficient under NYSDOT.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's record showed only local impact on her immediate school community and did not demonstrate a nationally significant influence on the field as a whole. The employer's debarment from sponsoring visas does not constitute grounds for a waiver, other schools could petition on her behalf, and mere competence and local recognition are insufficient under NYSDOT. The petitioner failed to show a past record of achievement justifying projections of nationally significant future benefit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=17508 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
What the decision said
The AAO did not separately resolve prong one, instead focusing its analysis on national scope and the petitioner's individual impact compared to U.S. workers. The decision implicitly accepts that education has intrinsic merit but does not make a formal finding on this prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately resolve prong one, instead focusing its analysis on national scope and the petitioner's individual impact compared to U.S. workers. The decision implicitly accepts that education has intrinsic merit but does not make a formal finding on this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=17506 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence showed only local-level impact on her school community. The NCLB Act did not give national scope to the work of an individual teacher, and participation in a pilot program did not show that the petitioner was responsible for its creation or wider implementation. The overall importance of a statute does not translate to individual national-level benefit for every worker it covers.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence showed only local-level impact on her school community. The NCLB Act did not give national scope to the work of an individual teacher, and participation in a pilot program did not show that the petitioner was responsible for its creation or wider implementation. The overall importance of a statute does not translate to individual national-level benefit for every worker it covers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=17507 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's qualifications (advanced degree, teaching experience, professional certifications) relate to exceptional ability but exceptional ability is not sufficient for a NIW. The employer's debarment does not substitute for demonstrating national interest. The NCLBA 'Highly Qualified Teacher' standard does not exempt teachers from the job offer requirement.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's qualifications (advanced degree, teaching experience, professional certifications) relate to exceptional ability but exceptional ability is not sufficient for a NIW. The employer's debarment does not substitute for demonstrating national interest. The NCLBA 'Highly Qualified Teacher' standard does not exempt teachers from the job offer requirement. Reference letters, awards, and evaluations did not show that the petitioner's impact exceeded that of similarly qualified U.S. mathematics teachers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=17495 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c