Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20561–20570

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that none of the claimed prizes or awards were demonstrated to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The second-place finish lacked supporting evidence of national/international recognition; the gold medal was from a regional competition; the honorary titles were not shown to be nationally/internationally recognized beyond the awarding festival; and the scholarship was for ac…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that none of the claimed prizes or awards were demonstrated to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. The second-place finish lacked supporting evidence of national/international recognition; the gold medal was from a regional competition; the honorary titles were not shown to be nationally/internationally recognized beyond the awarding festival; and the scholarship was for academic study, not excellence in the field as a professional musician.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_01_B2203; source_row=17467
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO withdrew the director's finding, holding that criterion vii is limited to the visual arts and does not encompass music performances. Because the beneficiary is a tabla musician and not a visual artist with tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions, the criterion was not met.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, holding that criterion vii is limited to the visual arts and does not encompass music performances. Because the beneficiary is a tabla musician and not a visual artist with tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions, the criterion was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_01_B2203; source_row=17472
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner's awards, credentials, and reference letters demonstrated only local or institutional impact and did not establish influence on the field as a whole or that she would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker. Exceptional ability and 'Highly Qualified Teacher' status under NCLBA are not sufficient grounds for a national interest waiver.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's awards, credentials, and reference letters demonstrated only local or institutional impact and did not establish influence on the field as a whole or that she would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker. Exceptional ability and 'Highly Qualified Teacher' status under NCLBA are not sufficient grounds for a national interest waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_03_B5203; source_row=17483
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's work had an impact or influence outside of the school where she taught. Her awards were of only local, regional, or institutional significance. The petitioner's exceptional qualifications do not, by themselves, satisfy this prong since exceptional ability is subject to the job offer requirement.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's work had an impact or influence outside of the school where she taught. Her awards were of only local, regional, or institutional significance. The petitioner's exceptional qualifications do not, by themselves, satisfy this prong since exceptional ability is subject to the job offer requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_04_B5203; source_row=17486
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that certificates praising perfect attendance and naming the petitioner 'Most Likely to Give a Test' did not constitute meaningful evidence of influence on the field, and that the NCLBA's highly qualified teacher standard does not distinguish the petitioner from other U.S. teachers or justify a blanket waiver.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that certificates praising perfect attendance and naming the petitioner 'Most Likely to Give a Test' did not constitute meaningful evidence of influence on the field, and that the NCLBA's highly qualified teacher standard does not distinguish the petitioner from other U.S. teachers or justify a blanket waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_02_B5203; source_row=17480
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO conceded that the petitioner's work as an elementary school special education teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO conceded that the petitioner's work as an elementary school special education teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_03_B5203; source_row=17481
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the reference letters, certificates, and other evidence showed only local/school-level impact, not national scope. General arguments about the importance of education or the NCLBA cannot establish that an individual teacher's work is national in scope. NYSDOT itself cited elementary school teachers as an example of professionals whose individual work generally does not produce national-scope benefits.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the reference letters, certificates, and other evidence showed only local/school-level impact, not national scope. General arguments about the importance of education or the NCLBA cannot establish that an individual teacher's work is national in scope. NYSDOT itself cited elementary school teachers as an example of professionals whose individual work generally does not produce national-scope benefits.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_03_B5203; source_row=17482
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's work as an elementary school inclusion teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's work as an elementary school inclusion teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_04_B5203; source_row=17484
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner's evidence—letters of support, awards, and general policy documents about education—did not show that the benefits of her individual teaching work extended beyond her school or local district. NYSDOT itself cited the work of a single schoolteacher as an example of local-scope work that does not satisfy this prong.…

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's evidence—letters of support, awards, and general policy documents about education—did not show that the benefits of her individual teaching work extended beyond her school or local district. NYSDOT itself cited the work of a single schoolteacher as an example of local-scope work that does not satisfy this prong. The aggregate national effect from thousands of teachers does not give national scope to the work of each individual teacher.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_04_B5203; source_row=17485
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

The AAO did not reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not reach the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-01-09_01_B2203; source_row=17474
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment