Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The AAO accepted only 10 months from the graduate assistant position, 6 months from one employer (due to contradictions from the asset purchase agreement about the actual start date), and 18 months from another employer—totaling far less than 60 months.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO accepted only 10 months from the graduate assistant position, 6 months from one employer (due to contradictions from the asset purchase agreement about the actual start date), and 18 months from another employer—totaling far less than 60 months. The letter for the hyperion consultant position (June 2007–September 2009) was rejected because it lacked company letterhead and did not demonstrate the supervisor could account for the beneficiary's work at multiple locations, and primary evidence was available but not provided. The employer not listed on the labor certification was disregarded, and experience with the petitioner itself could not qualify because the position was substantially comparable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-26_03_B5203; source_row=17420 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the petitioner's work as a cardiology researcher would be national in scope, noting expert letters supported this second prong.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the petitioner's work as a cardiology researcher would be national in scope, noting expert letters supported this second prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-23_01_B5203; source_row=17414 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest served to substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence showed he is a capable cardiology fellow with a favorable reputation among colleagues, but there was no documentary evidence that his work had independently influenced the field as a whole.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence showed he is a capable cardiology fellow with a favorable reputation among colleagues, but there was no documentary evidence that his work had independently influenced the field as a whole. Expert letters speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating actual influence, the key article was published after the filing date and thus could not establish eligibility as of the filing date, and recognition received was of institutional rather than national significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-23_01_B5203; source_row=17415 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
possession of advanced degree or foreign equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed that a foreign equivalent degree must come from a college or university, and that membership in a professional society—even if considered 'comparable' to a bachelor's degree by EDGE—is only the 'equivalent' of a degree rather than a 'foreign equivalent degree' within the regulatory definition. The professional society is not an institution of higher education capable of conferring a degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that a foreign equivalent degree must come from a college or university, and that membership in a professional society—even if considered 'comparable' to a bachelor's degree by EDGE—is only the 'equivalent' of a degree rather than a 'foreign equivalent degree' within the regulatory definition. The professional society is not an institution of higher education capable of conferring a degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-19_02_B5203; source_row=17412 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's reference letters lacked specific examples of how his work influenced the field as a whole; his citation evidence was self-compiled and unsupported; his qualifications, skills, and potential contributions do not rise to the level needed to outweigh the national interest in labor certification protections. Eligibility is assessed as of the filing date, and claims of future or potential impact are insufficient.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's reference letters lacked specific examples of how his work influenced the field as a whole; his citation evidence was self-compiled and unsupported; his qualifications, skills, and potential contributions do not rise to the level needed to outweigh the national interest in labor certification protections. Eligibility is assessed as of the filing date, and claims of future or potential impact are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-16_01_B5203; source_row=17411 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's 2012 Form 1120 reflected only $7,146.00 in net income and -$67,577.00 in net current assets, which were insufficient to cover the gap between the proffered wage and wages actually paid. Reliance on gross receipts is misplaced; net income is the proper measure.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2012 Form 1120 reflected only $7,146.00 in net income and -$67,577.00 in net current assets, which were insufficient to cover the gap between the proffered wage and wages actually paid. Reliance on gross receipts is misplaced; net income is the proper measure.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-12_02_B5203; source_row=17407 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay proffered wages for multiple I-140 beneficiaries
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner filed multiple I-140 petitions for other beneficiaries, requiring it to demonstrate ability to pay all proffered wages combined. The payroll records submitted showed none of the other beneficiaries were paid their proffered wages, and those records were inconsistent with the W-2 data.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner filed multiple I-140 petitions for other beneficiaries, requiring it to demonstrate ability to pay all proffered wages combined. The payroll records submitted showed none of the other beneficiaries were paid their proffered wages, and those records were inconsistent with the W-2 data. The petitioner also failed to provide requested information about withdrawals and missing wage data, precluding a full assessment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-12_02_B5203; source_row=17408 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c