Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20671–20680

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Net income sufficient to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's 2012 net income was -$69, which does not cover the proffered wage. The petitioner's line of credit is an unenforceable bank commitment and cannot be added to net income. Depreciable non-current assets are not converted to cash in the ordinary course of business.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2012 net income was -$69, which does not cover the proffered wage. The petitioner's line of credit is an unenforceable bank commitment and cannot be added to net income. Depreciable non-current assets are not converted to cash in the ordinary course of business.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_03_B5203; source_row=17346
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Two years of work experience in job offered

Why AAO was not persuaded

The employment verification documents were deficient: one letter failed to specify full-time or part-time status and did not identify its author; two archival certificates failed to describe the beneficiary's duties and did not specify full-time or part-time status. As a result, two full-time years of qualifying work experience were not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The employment verification documents were deficient: one letter failed to specify full-time or part-time status and did not identify its author; two archival certificates failed to describe the beneficiary's duties and did not specify full-time or part-time status. As a result, two full-time years of qualifying work experience were not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_03_B5203; source_row=17350
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

same job opportunity as on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary's current position with the successor has different duties and uses different technologies than the software engineer position certified by DOL, and the successor submitted no documentary evidence that it intends to employ the beneficiary in the offered position.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's current position with the successor has different duties and uses different technologies than the software engineer position certified by DOL, and the successor submitted no documentary evidence that it intends to employ the beneficiary in the offered position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_05_B5203; source_row=17354
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

evidence of acquisition/merger

Why the evidence was persuasive

Despite limited corroboration, the preponderance of the evidence established that the petitioner merged into the filing corporation effective December 1, 2012.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Despite limited corroboration, the preponderance of the evidence established that the petitioner merged into the filing corporation effective December 1, 2012.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_05_B5203; source_row=17352
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The filing entity did not produce the petitioner's 2012 annual report, federal tax return, or audited financial statements as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), and payroll records cannot substitute for the required documentation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The filing entity did not produce the petitioner's 2012 annual report, federal tax return, or audited financial statements as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), and payroll records cannot substitute for the required documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_05_B5203; source_row=17353
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that establishing the national significance of science education does not mean that the work of one teacher produces benefits that are national in scope. The NYSDOT decision itself cautions that the impact of a single schoolteacher in one elementary school would not be national in scope for NIW purposes.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that establishing the national significance of science education does not mean that the work of one teacher produces benefits that are national in scope. The NYSDOT decision itself cautions that the impact of a single schoolteacher in one elementary school would not be national in scope for NIW purposes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_12_B5203; source_row=17374
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's work as an elementary school teacher has substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's work as an elementary school teacher has substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_12_B5203; source_row=17373
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the petitioner failed to provide any financial documentation in response to the NOID and failed to address the combined wage obligations for its 40+ other pending I-140 petitions, leaving ability to pay unestablished.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner failed to provide any financial documentation in response to the NOID and failed to address the combined wage obligations for its 40+ other pending I-140 petitions, leaving ability to pay unestablished.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_01_B5203; source_row=17341
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

minimum educational requirements of the offered position

Why AAO was not persuaded

Part H.4 of the ETA Form 9089 requires a bachelor's degree; Part H.9 allows a foreign equivalent. Under the plain language, a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent is required, and the beneficiary's three-year Indian degree does not qualify.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Part H.4 of the ETA Form 9089 requires a bachelor's degree; Part H.9 allows a foreign equivalent. Under the plain language, a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent is required, and the beneficiary's three-year Indian degree does not qualify.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_01_B5203; source_row=17339
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

good and sufficient cause to revoke based on bona fides of job offer

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO finds the record does not show the petitioner lacked intent to employ at the relevant times, nor that the beneficiary lacked intent to work for the petitioner when he filed the I-485, so good and sufficient cause to revoke was not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds the record does not show the petitioner lacked intent to employ at the relevant times, nor that the beneficiary lacked intent to work for the petitioner when he filed the I-485, so good and sufficient cause to revoke was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_07_B5203; source_row=17358
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment