Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary meets minimum requirements of labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded the MCA is not equivalent to a Master of Computer Science (per EDGE) but is equivalent to a master's in a related field allowed by Parts 7/7A of the labor certification, so the beneficiary qualifies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the MCA is not equivalent to a Master of Computer Science (per EDGE) but is equivalent to a master's in a related field allowed by Parts 7/7A of the labor certification, so the beneficiary qualifies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_02_B5203; source_row=17343 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found insufficient net income or net current assets to cover the aggregate proffered wages of over 34 sponsored workers, rejected hybrid accounting and combination of taxable income with net current assets, and found unaudited balance sheets unreliable.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found insufficient net income or net current assets to cover the aggregate proffered wages of over 34 sponsored workers, rejected hybrid accounting and combination of taxable income with net current assets, and found unaudited balance sheets unreliable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_02_B5203; source_row=17344 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Petitioner active and in good standing in state of proposed employment
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO rescinded the prior mootness finding because the petitioner submitted new evidence — a Certificate of Authority from New Jersey — demonstrating its right to conduct business in that state.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rescinded the prior mootness finding because the petitioner submitted new evidence — a Certificate of Authority from New Jersey — demonstrating its right to conduct business in that state.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_06_B5203; source_row=17355 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Labor certification valid for area of intended employment / recruitment disclosed actual job requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the recruitment materials did not notify potential U.S. workers that travel or work at alternate worksites would be required, and the prevailing wage determination was submitted as though no travel was needed—despite the beneficiary actually working at remote contract locations. The petitioner's own descriptions of the position contradicted the terms stated on the labor certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the recruitment materials did not notify potential U.S. workers that travel or work at alternate worksites would be required, and the prevailing wage determination was submitted as though no travel was needed—despite the beneficiary actually working at remote contract locations. The petitioner's own descriptions of the position contradicted the terms stated on the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_06_B5203; source_row=17356 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay the proffered wage from priority date onwards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the petitioner's evidence of historic business growth established ability to pay the proffered wage under Matter of Sonegawa, rescinding the prior AAO conclusion to the contrary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's evidence of historic business growth established ability to pay the proffered wage under Matter of Sonegawa, rescinding the prior AAO conclusion to the contrary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_06_B5203; source_row=17357 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate national-scope influence. His publications had no citations, his peer review work was self-initiated and recent, and his online forum role was not shown to require or confer a national reputation.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate national-scope influence. His publications had no citations, his peer review work was self-initiated and recent, and his online forum role was not shown to require or confer a national reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_13_B5203; source_row=17377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO affirmed that 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B) requires an official academic record, that the SpanTran third-party evaluation is not a substitute for the official record, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate unavailability of the primary evidence, which is a prerequisite for relying on secondary evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B) requires an official academic record, that the SpanTran third-party evaluation is not a substitute for the official record, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate unavailability of the primary evidence, which is a prerequisite for relying on secondary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_09_B5203; source_row=17362 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social SciencesMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's impact was confined to her school district. The NCLBA does not amend the immigration statute or create a blanket waiver for teachers. Counsel's assertion that different jurisdictions use different curricula actually underscored the local nature of the petitioner's impact.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's impact was confined to her school district. The NCLBA does not amend the immigration statute or create a blanket waiver for teachers. Counsel's assertion that different jurisdictions use different curricula actually underscored the local nature of the petitioner's impact. Presidential remarks and federal education policy goals do not override standing legislation or supersede the NYSDOT framework.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-05_09_B5203; source_row=17364 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c