Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20711–20720

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest served to substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that professional competence and local-impact achievements do not satisfy the third NYSDOT prong; the petitioner's textbooks addressed Philippine education needs without demonstrated relevance to U.S. schools; and the figures cited by counsel were too narrowly focused to support broader conclusions about the petitioner's superiority over U.S. workers.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that professional competence and local-impact achievements do not satisfy the third NYSDOT prong; the petitioner's textbooks addressed Philippine education needs without demonstrated relevance to U.S. schools; and the figures cited by counsel were too narrowly focused to support broader conclusions about the petitioner's superiority over U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-03_01_B5203; source_row=17325
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

NYSDOT specifically identified elementary school teachers as an example of an occupation with substantial intrinsic merit, and this prong was not disputed.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
NYSDOT specifically identified elementary school teachers as an example of an occupation with substantial intrinsic merit, and this prong was not disputed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-03_03_B5203; source_row=17329
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's witnesses, certificates, and professional record showed impact only at the local school level. Counsel's NCLBA-based blanket waiver argument was rejected because the NCLBA contains no immigration provisions and did not amend section 203(b)(2) of the Act.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's witnesses, certificates, and professional record showed impact only at the local school level. Counsel's NCLBA-based blanket waiver argument was rejected because the NCLBA contains no immigration provisions and did not amend section 203(b)(2) of the Act.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-03_03_B5203; source_row=17330
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO did not dispute that teaching as a profession has substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not dispute that teaching as a profession has substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-03_02_B5203; source_row=17326
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the petitioner's work was local in nature and the NCLBA did not create a blanket waiver or establish that any individual 'Highly Qualified Teacher' provides nationally scoped benefit. The text of the NCLBA makes no mention of immigration, the national interest waiver, or any immigration provisions.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's work was local in nature and the NCLBA did not create a blanket waiver or establish that any individual 'Highly Qualified Teacher' provides nationally scoped benefit. The text of the NCLBA makes no mention of immigration, the national interest waiver, or any immigration provisions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-12-03_02_B5203; source_row=17327
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner merely repeated prior assertions without providing persuasive legal argument, precedent, or documentary evidence. The AAO found the Hague Academy acceptance not comparable in caliber to the regulatory membership criterion. No evidence supported the claim that there are no qualifying associations in international law.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner merely repeated prior assertions without providing persuasive legal argument, precedent, or documentary evidence. The AAO found the Hague Academy acceptance not comparable in caliber to the regulatory membership criterion. No evidence supported the claim that there are no qualifying associations in international law.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=17314
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

Having a UN Annual Grounds Pass as one of multiple additional representatives does not establish a leading or critical role for the NYCBA. The petitioner submitted no letter from a NYCBA officer specifying his contributions or functions, and did not show how his role was situated in the organizational hierarchy. Moreover, the regulation requires a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations in the plural.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Having a UN Annual Grounds Pass as one of multiple additional representatives does not establish a leading or critical role for the NYCBA. The petitioner submitted no letter from a NYCBA officer specifying his contributions or functions, and did not show how his role was situated in the organizational hierarchy. Moreover, the regulation requires a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=17319
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

Authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

The law school's Institutional Repository is not a professional or major trade publication or major media. The copyright agreement did not establish the Summer 2010 article was published before the filing date. Acknowledging a translator/researcher in a biographical footnote does not constitute authorship. Additionally, the regulation requires authorship of articles (plural) in more than one publication.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The law school's Institutional Repository is not a professional or major trade publication or major media. The copyright agreement did not establish the Summer 2010 article was published before the filing date. Acknowledging a translator/researcher in a biographical footnote does not constitute authorship. Additionally, the regulation requires authorship of articles (plural) in more than one publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=17318
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Major award

One-time achievement (major, internationally recognized award)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's attendance at the Hague Academy occurred after the petition's filing date, so it could not establish eligibility. In any event, selection to attend summer courses is evidence of pursuit of further educational training, not a major internationally recognized award comparable to a Nobel Prize.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's attendance at the Hague Academy occurred after the petition's filing date, so it could not establish eligibility. In any event, selection to attend summer courses is evidence of pursuit of further educational training, not a major internationally recognized award comparable to a Nobel Prize.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=17312
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

Participation as judge of others' work

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO's prior appellate decision determined that the petitioner's evidence met the criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv). This was not revisited on motion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO's prior appellate decision determined that the petitioner's evidence met the criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv). This was not revisited on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=17316
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment