Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Extraordinary ability in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics
Why AAO was not persuaded
The phrase 'in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics' in section 203(b)(1)(A) is not superfluous and excludes the general practice of law. The petitioner did not show he intends to work as corporate counsel, in-house counsel, law professor, or legal researcher — the only lawyer roles that could conceivably fall within the enumerated fields.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The phrase 'in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics' in section 203(b)(1)(A) is not superfluous and excludes the general practice of law. The petitioner did not show he intends to work as corporate counsel, in-house counsel, law professor, or legal researcher — the only lawyer roles that could conceivably fall within the enumerated fields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=17311 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the petitioner's impact was limited to his local school district and did not extend to a national level. Reference letters praised his local contributions but did not establish national-scope impact. General evidence about the importance of STEM education addressed only intrinsic merit, not national scope.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's impact was limited to his local school district and did not extend to a national level. Reference letters praised his local contributions but did not establish national-scope impact. General evidence about the importance of STEM education addressed only intrinsic merit, not national scope. The NCLBA did not modify or supersede NYSDOT, and counsel's arguments about the national scope of education reform did not establish that this individual teacher's work was national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_02_B5203; source_row=17321 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his past record of achievement shows influence on the field as a whole or that he would benefit the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a similarly qualified U.S. worker.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his past record of achievement shows influence on the field as a whole or that he would benefit the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a similarly qualified U.S. worker. Awards had only local or institutional significance, reference letters addressed only local impact, and special training or certifications do not inherently meet the national interest threshold. The NYSDOT guidelines do not require USCIS to identify a comparable U.S. worker; the burden rests with the petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-29_02_B5203; source_row=17322 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the petitioner failed to show the award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and because the criterion requires more than one award. Academic awards also do not qualify as they relate to training rather than the field of endeavor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the petitioner failed to show the award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and because the criterion requires more than one award. Academic awards also do not qualify as they relate to training rather than the field of endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_01_B2203; source_row=17283 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's patents, articles, and books did not demonstrate contributions of major significance. Citation counts were low and unindicative of major significance. Support letters were vague and solicited. The single book relied upon on appeal showed limited use at only two universities and the petitioner's role was as a cooperator, not an author.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's patents, articles, and books did not demonstrate contributions of major significance. Citation counts were low and unindicative of major significance. Support letters were vague and solicited. The single book relied upon on appeal showed limited use at only two universities and the petitioner's role was as a cooperator, not an author. The regulation also requires more than one original contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_01_B2203; source_row=17285 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence of credentials, evaluations, and community involvement does not demonstrate that she has influenced her field as a whole or has achieved more than other similarly qualified teachers. The labor certification process is the appropriate avenue for addressing worker shortages, and NYSDOT does not require an item-by-item comparison but does require a record of influence on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence of credentials, evaluations, and community involvement does not demonstrate that she has influenced her field as a whole or has achieved more than other similarly qualified teachers. The labor certification process is the appropriate avenue for addressing worker shortages, and NYSDOT does not require an item-by-item comparison but does require a record of influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_10_B5203; source_row=17310 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification requires advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
The labor certification requires only a bachelor's degree and 12 months of experience, falling short of the advanced-degree threshold under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The labor certification requires only a bachelor's degree and 12 months of experience, falling short of the advanced-degree threshold under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_04_B5203; source_row=17296 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The two evaluations contradicted each other on the equivalency of the three-year bachelor's degree, undermining their reliability. AACRAO EDGE determined the combination of the three-year bachelor's and two-year master's was only equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. USCIS does not consider a three-year degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree per Matter of Shah.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The two evaluations contradicted each other on the equivalency of the three-year bachelor's degree, undermining their reliability. AACRAO EDGE determined the combination of the three-year bachelor's and two-year master's was only equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. USCIS does not consider a three-year degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree per Matter of Shah.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_06_B5203; source_row=17299 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's credentials (Master's degree, state certifications, teaching experience) are held by a large proportion of special educators in the United States—approximately 59% hold a Master's degree and 92% are fully certified—so her qualifications do not stand apart from those of most others in her field.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's credentials (Master's degree, state certifications, teaching experience) are held by a large proportion of special educators in the United States—approximately 59% hold a Master's degree and 92% are fully certified—so her qualifications do not stand apart from those of most others in her field. The petitioner also failed to demonstrate a past record of influence on the field as a whole that would justify a waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_09_B5203; source_row=17307 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c