Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Consistency of beneficiary's claimed employment history
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the part-time employment explanation was unpersuasive because both the labor certification and the Form G-325A expressly required the beneficiary to list all past employment, and counsel offered no adequate justification for omitting it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the part-time employment explanation was unpersuasive because both the labor certification and the Form G-325A expressly required the beneficiary to list all past employment, and counsel offered no adequate justification for omitting it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_03_B5203; source_row=17294 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Genuine principal place of business / physical worksite
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the seller's permit only establishes authorization to conduct business, not that actual business was being conducted or that a physical office existed. The photographs showed multiple businesses sharing the same office suite with no identifying information for the petitioner, and counsel's assertions without new evidence were insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the seller's permit only establishes authorization to conduct business, not that actual business was being conducted or that a physical office existed. The photographs showed multiple businesses sharing the same office suite with no identifying information for the petitioner, and counsel's assertions without new evidence were insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_03_B5203; source_row=17293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence showed only local or school-level impact. NYSDOT explicitly cited elementary schoolteachers as an example of professionals whose individual work does not produce benefits national in scope. General arguments about the importance of special education or teacher shortages address only the intrinsic merit prong, not national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence showed only local or school-level impact. NYSDOT explicitly cited elementary schoolteachers as an example of professionals whose individual work does not produce benefits national in scope. General arguments about the importance of special education or teacher shortages address only the intrinsic merit prong, not national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_10_B5203; source_row=17309 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
Without a valid successorship, the petitioner cannot use the labor certification employer's wage payments or assets, and its own tax returns and W-2s do not cover the gaps from the priority date forward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Without a valid successorship, the petitioner cannot use the labor certification employer's wage payments or assets, and its own tax returns and W-2s do not cover the gaps from the priority date forward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_04_B5203; source_row=17297 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
A review of the record reflects that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing that he meets the plain language of the scholarly articles criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
A review of the record reflects that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing that he meets the plain language of the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_01_B2203; source_row=17286 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The director did not address this issue, but the AAO found on its own review that the petitioner submitted no evidence of intent to continue work in the U.S., such as prospective employer letters, contracts, or a detailed plan.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The director did not address this issue, but the AAO found on its own review that the petitioner submitted no evidence of intent to continue work in the U.S., such as prospective employer letters, contracts, or a detailed plan.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_01_B2203; source_row=17291 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's qualifying experience for offered position
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found it correctly applied DOL regulations at 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3) to exclude the beneficiary's experience with the petitioning employer. Counsel's interpretation of 'substantially comparable' conflicted with BALCA precedent, and the petitioner failed to submit any evidence showing the beneficiary's current duties differed in time percentages from the offered position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found it correctly applied DOL regulations at 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3) to exclude the beneficiary's experience with the petitioning employer. Counsel's interpretation of 'substantially comparable' conflicted with BALCA precedent, and the petitioner failed to submit any evidence showing the beneficiary's current duties differed in time percentages from the offered position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_05_B5203; source_row=17298 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found no documentary evidence demonstrating that the petitioner's work had influenced the field of special education as a whole or that she had achieved a record of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field at a national level. The petitioner's credentials did not exceed the average U.S. special educator, and the labor shortage issue was one for the Department of Labor, not a basis for a NIW.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found no documentary evidence demonstrating that the petitioner's work had influenced the field of special education as a whole or that she had achieved a record of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field at a national level. The petitioner's credentials did not exceed the average U.S. special educator, and the labor shortage issue was one for the Department of Labor, not a basis for a NIW.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-27_07_B5203; source_row=17304 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c