Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found that the omission of previously-fraudulent experience cannot itself constitute new fraud, that statements about business affiliations were immaterial, and that the second Form G-325A discrepancy was explained. The prior misrepresentation cast doubt on evidence generally but was insufficient to support a standalone fraud finding in this matter.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the omission of previously-fraudulent experience cannot itself constitute new fraud, that statements about business affiliations were immaterial, and that the second Form G-325A discrepancy was explained. The prior misrepresentation cast doubt on evidence generally but was insufficient to support a standalone fraud finding in this matter.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-26_03_B5203; source_row=17282 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found insufficient evidence that the gold medal at this competition (with representatives from only five nations) is internationally recognized as a major award in the field. Corroborating expert letters used nearly identical language and lacked probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found insufficient evidence that the gold medal at this competition (with representatives from only five nations) is internationally recognized as a major award in the field. Corroborating expert letters used nearly identical language and lacked probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_01_B2203; source_row=17259 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the submitted translations did not comply with the certification requirements under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), stripping the evidence of probative value.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the submitted translations did not comply with the certification requirements under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), stripping the evidence of probative value. Even if translations had been compliant, the petitioner failed to identify the specific qualifying publication and did not establish that the identified outlets constitute professional, major trade, or major media publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=17270 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's conclusion that a founding CEO role is not leading or critical, holding that such a role is by its nature leading or critical within an organization's structure.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's conclusion that a founding CEO role is not leading or critical, holding that such a role is by its nature leading or critical within an organization's structure. Nonetheless, the criterion is still not met because: translation deficiencies leave no probative evidence of distinguished reputation; and the regulation requires qualifying roles for 'organizations or establishments' in the plural, while the petitioner only demonstrated a role for a single organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=17273 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Translation deficiencies stripped the published material and letters of support of probative value. The petitioner submitted no documentation showing how his e-commerce business in China was original. Furthermore, even if the company were considered an original contribution, it is a single contribution and the regulation requires 'contributions' in the plural.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Translation deficiencies stripped the published material and letters of support of probative value. The petitioner submitted no documentation showing how his e-commerce business in China was original. Furthermore, even if the company were considered an original contribution, it is a single contribution and the regulation requires 'contributions' in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=17271 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner offered only a passing reference to previously submitted evidence without substantive argument on appeal. More fundamentally, the evidence does not establish that the awards or prizes themselves are nationally or internationally recognized as awards for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner offered only a passing reference to previously submitted evidence without substantive argument on appeal. More fundamentally, the evidence does not establish that the awards or prizes themselves are nationally or internationally recognized as awards for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=17268 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agrees the petitioner has not shown a past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. NCLBA does not create an implied blanket waiver, and counsel's claims about the petitioner's effectiveness in raising student achievement were unsupported by evidence.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the petitioner has not shown a past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. NCLBA does not create an implied blanket waiver, and counsel's claims about the petitioner's effectiveness in raising student achievement were unsupported by evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_02_B5203; source_row=17278 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the letters either lacked descriptions of the petitioner's role and impact or contained duplicative language with diminished evidentiary weight, and the petitioner did not satisfy the plural-organizations requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the letters either lacked descriptions of the petitioner's role and impact or contained duplicative language with diminished evidentiary weight, and the petitioner did not satisfy the plural-organizations requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_01_B2203; source_row=17264 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Had the petitioner submitted translations complying with 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), the record would support the director's determination. Because the translations are non-compliant, the evidence lacks probative value and this criterion cannot be satisfied.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
Had the petitioner submitted translations complying with 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), the record would support the director's determination. Because the translations are non-compliant, the evidence lacks probative value and this criterion cannot be satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_02_B2203; source_row=17272 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social SciencesMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's impact was confined to her school and local area. The NCLBA does not amend the INA or establish a lower national-scope standard for teachers, and counsel's arguments about federal education priorities do not transform one teacher's local impact into a nationally significant contribution.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's impact was confined to her school and local area. The NCLBA does not amend the INA or establish a lower national-scope standard for teachers, and counsel's arguments about federal education priorities do not transform one teacher's local impact into a nationally significant contribution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-25_01_B5203; source_row=17266 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c