Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary meets minimum requirements of the offered position
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to establish the required master's degree. The experience letters were inadequate: one described duties inconsistent with the proffered position, another lacked required identifying information and showed inconsistent duties compared to the labor certification, and a supplemental affidavit failed to meet regulatory requirements and conflicted with the employer's own experience letter.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to establish the required master's degree. The experience letters were inadequate: one described duties inconsistent with the proffered position, another lacked required identifying information and showed inconsistent duties compared to the labor certification, and a supplemental affidavit failed to meet regulatory requirements and conflicted with the employer's own experience letter.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-21_02_B5203; source_row=17256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree or equivalent (bachelor's + 5 years progressive experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's self-authored employment letter was self-serving and contradicted by IRS records showing a solo video rental business with no employees and no matching salary. Customer letters were inconsistent with the claimed managerial duties at a video rental store, did not establish a full-time work schedule, and did not demonstrate advancing levels of responsibility in the specialty.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's self-authored employment letter was self-serving and contradicted by IRS records showing a solo video rental business with no employees and no matching salary. Customer letters were inconsistent with the claimed managerial duties at a video rental store, did not establish a full-time work schedule, and did not demonstrate advancing levels of responsibility in the specialty. The petitioner failed to resolve these inconsistencies with independent objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-19_02_B5203; source_row=17250 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets minimum requirements of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to establish the required 60 months of experience in the proffered position or as a computer systems technician for the same reasons the progressive experience requirement was not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to establish the required 60 months of experience in the proffered position or as a computer systems technician for the same reasons the progressive experience requirement was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-19_02_B5203; source_row=17251 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found one qualifying instance ([REDACTED] of America) but the plural requirement was not met; other letters either failed to establish a leading/critical role or did not establish the organization's distinguished reputation, and several letters contained suspiciously similar language reducing their probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found one qualifying instance ([REDACTED] of America) but the plural requirement was not met; other letters either failed to establish a leading/critical role or did not establish the organization's distinguished reputation, and several letters contained suspiciously similar language reducing their probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=17249 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found only one award was claimed, failing the plural requirement, and the petitioner did not establish national or international recognition of the prize beyond the issuing organization and a blog.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found only one award was claimed, failing the plural requirement, and the petitioner did not establish national or international recognition of the prize beyond the issuing organization and a blog.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=17243 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found expert letters used boilerplate or conclusory language without specific examples of impact, the award documentation indicated the prize hoped to enable future work rather than recognizing realized contributions, and similarities among letters reduced their probative value.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found expert letters used boilerplate or conclusory language without specific examples of impact, the award documentation indicated the prize hoped to enable future work rather than recognizing realized contributions, and similarities among letters reduced their probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=17247 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the translation defective, the statute did not show outstanding-achievement membership requirements, and trainer certification did not satisfy the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the translation defective, the statute did not show outstanding-achievement membership requirements, and trainer certification did not satisfy the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=17244 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO accepted the January 2010 article as qualifying but found the March 2011 article merely mentioned the petitioner in one sentence; a single qualifying article cannot satisfy the plural requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted the January 2010 article as qualifying but found the March 2011 article merely mentioned the petitioner in one sentence; a single qualifying article cannot satisfy the plural requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=17245 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
A single foreign equivalent degree is required; combination of a three-year bachelor's degree, a distance-learning diploma, and a vocational certificate cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree. The three-year degree is only comparable to three years of U.S. university study per EDGE.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
A single foreign equivalent degree is required; combination of a three-year bachelor's degree, a distance-learning diploma, and a vocational certificate cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree. The three-year degree is only comparable to three years of U.S. university study per EDGE. The postgraduate diploma was not shown to be from an AICTE-accredited institution or to require a three-year degree for admission. The certification is vocational, not academic. Private correspondence from an INS official is not binding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-14_05_B5203; source_row=17239 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c