Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked evidence of the petitioner's industry reputation, historical growth, or consistent employee count, and provided no evidence of net income or net current assets for 2011 onward. Considering the totality of circumstances, the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked evidence of the petitioner's industry reputation, historical growth, or consistent employee count, and provided no evidence of net income or net current assets for 2011 onward. Considering the totality of circumstances, the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_01_B5203; source_row=17178 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letters were vague or speculative regarding actual impact, the citation evidence was limited and not commensurate with major-impact articles, and there was no evidence of widespread implementation such as hospital guidelines or wide use of the textbooks.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letters were vague or speculative regarding actual impact, the citation evidence was limited and not commensurate with major-impact articles, and there was no evidence of widespread implementation such as hospital guidelines or wide use of the textbooks.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B2203; source_row=17187 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of full-time work experience in the proffered position
Why AAO was not persuaded
The experience letters are insufficient: one certificate covers only about one year of employment, and the Municipal Health Officer certifications do not confirm full-time employment, appear to be from coworkers rather than employers, and conflict with entries on the ETA Form 9089.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The experience letters are insufficient: one certificate covers only about one year of employment, and the Municipal Health Officer certifications do not confirm full-time employment, appear to be from coworkers rather than employers, and conflict with entries on the ETA Form 9089.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B5203; source_row=17193 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the petitioner satisfied all requirements under Matter of Dial Auto Repair Shop, Inc. and the AFM for amending a previously approved I-140 as a successor-in-interest.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner satisfied all requirements under Matter of Dial Auto Repair Shop, Inc. and the AFM for amending a previously approved I-140 as a successor-in-interest.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B5203; source_row=17191 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
educational requirement (bachelor's degree in physical therapy)
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record includes a copy of the beneficiary's bachelor of science in physical therapy and academic transcripts confirming the educational requirement is satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record includes a copy of the beneficiary's bachelor of science in physical therapy and academic transcripts confirming the educational requirement is satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_03_B5203; source_row=17192 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO held that a final merits determination was unnecessary because the petitioner did not first satisfy the initial evidence requirement of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted its view that the evidence would not satisfy the final merits standard.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO held that a final merits determination was unnecessary because the petitioner did not first satisfy the initial evidence requirement of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted its view that the evidence would not satisfy the final merits standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-12_04_B2203; source_row=17201 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c