Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The petitioner had filed numerous I-140 petitions and must demonstrate its ability to pay all combined proffered wages of pending petitions from the priority date onward. Documentation of pre-2009 petitions was missing from the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner had filed numerous I-140 petitions and must demonstrate its ability to pay all combined proffered wages of pending petitions from the priority date onward. Documentation of pre-2009 petitions was missing from the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-07_01_B5203; source_row=17175 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree / member of the professions qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that possession of an advanced degree alone is insufficient; the beneficiary must also be a member of the professions requiring at minimum a baccalaureate degree. No such claim was made or established for self-employment in commodity sales. However, AAO found the beneficiary qualifies under the exceptional ability prong instead, so this finding does not affect the outcome.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that possession of an advanced degree alone is insufficient; the beneficiary must also be a member of the professions requiring at minimum a baccalaureate degree. No such claim was made or established for self-employment in commodity sales. However, AAO found the beneficiary qualifies under the exceptional ability prong instead, so this finding does not affect the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-06_02_B5203; source_row=17169 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the petitioner possessed the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage beginning on the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the petitioner possessed the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage beginning on the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-06_01_B5203; source_row=17168 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the record demonstrated the beneficiary's impact extends beyond customer satisfaction—his efforts helped many small companies stay in business by circumventing monopolistic supplier practices and extending otherwise unavailable credit, producing individually and cumulatively positive effects beyond merely running a successful business.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record demonstrated the beneficiary's impact extends beyond customer satisfaction—his efforts helped many small companies stay in business by circumventing monopolistic supplier practices and extending otherwise unavailable credit, producing individually and cumulatively positive effects beyond merely running a successful business.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-06_02_B5203; source_row=17172 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters focused on the petitioner's achievements and status as an elite swimmer but did not provide specific examples of how her work significantly impacted the field at large. Talent and success are not necessarily indicative of original athletic contributions of major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters focused on the petitioner's achievements and status as an elite swimmer but did not provide specific examples of how her work significantly impacted the field at large. Talent and success are not necessarily indicative of original athletic contributions of major significance. The comparable evidence provision was also inapplicable because the petitioner did not sufficiently establish that the standard criteria do not readily apply to her occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-05_02_B2203; source_row=17163 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the organization lacked a distinguished reputation, finding sufficient evidence that the hospital was recognized among the top three percent nationally.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the organization lacked a distinguished reputation, finding sufficient evidence that the hospital was recognized among the top three percent nationally. However, the AAO affirmed denial because (1) the petitioner's residency position was not demonstrated to be a leading or critical role for the hospital as a whole, and (2) the regulation requires plural organizations or establishments, and the petitioner only claimed one qualifying organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-05_01_B2203; source_row=17155 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the expert letters submitted either spoke to potential future impact rather than already-realized contributions, lacked specificity about how the petitioner's work impacted the field as a whole, or were largely conclusory. The minimal citation counts for the petitioner's articles were insufficient to establish major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the expert letters submitted either spoke to potential future impact rather than already-realized contributions, lacked specificity about how the petitioner's work impacted the field as a whole, or were largely conclusory. The minimal citation counts for the petitioner's articles were insufficient to establish major significance. Letters alone, without corroborating objective evidence of actual field-wide impact, cannot meet this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-05_01_B2203; source_row=17153 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
benefit to national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that exceptional credentials, advanced certification, and being a popular and effective teacher do not establish eligibility for the waiver. The petitioner's past record—including teaching in the Philippines and graduate research from 2001—did not demonstrate a level of past achievement and influence on the field as a whole sufficient to justify the waiver.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that exceptional credentials, advanced certification, and being a popular and effective teacher do not establish eligibility for the waiver. The petitioner's past record—including teaching in the Philippines and graduate research from 2001—did not demonstrate a level of past achievement and influence on the field as a whole sufficient to justify the waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-11-05_01_B5203; source_row=17159 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c