Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
60 months of qualifying experience as controller or senior accountant
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO identified material inconsistencies regarding employment dates, titles, duties, and a contradictory G-325A claim of unemployment, none of which were resolved by independent objective evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO identified material inconsistencies regarding employment dates, titles, duties, and a contradictory G-325A claim of unemployment, none of which were resolved by independent objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-23_01_B5203; source_row=17104 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
motion to reopen — new facts
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not address the basis for the prior dismissal and instead requested additional time to obtain evidence from Egypt; counsel later conceded the inability to obtain additional evidence. The governing regulation contains no provision for additional time to submit evidence on motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not address the basis for the prior dismissal and instead requested additional time to obtain evidence from Egypt; counsel later conceded the inability to obtain additional evidence. The governing regulation contains no provision for additional time to submit evidence on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-23_02_B2203; source_row=17107 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that mere authorship of scholarly articles cannot satisfy this criterion absent evidence of major significance; journal impact factors assess the journal rather than individual articles; citation counts were not shown to be above the level typical for contributions of major significance; and government funding and website references at most show the work is useful, not that it constitutes major contributions.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that mere authorship of scholarly articles cannot satisfy this criterion absent evidence of major significance; journal impact factors assess the journal rather than individual articles; citation counts were not shown to be above the level typical for contributions of major significance; and government funding and website references at most show the work is useful, not that it constitutes major contributions. The petitioner also abandoned the reference letter issue by not challenging it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B2203; source_row=17090 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the translation certification deficient because it did not state the translator's competence in Chinese-to-English translation, the website claimed as major media had a significantly lower global rank than foxnews.com, one article did not mention the petitioner, and neither article included author information as required by the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the translation certification deficient because it did not state the translator's competence in Chinese-to-English translation, the website claimed as major media had a significantly lower global rank than foxnews.com, one article did not mention the petitioner, and neither article included author information as required by the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B2203; source_row=17088 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the association's senior membership requirements (10 years of professional practice and publication of papers) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and there was no showing that recognized national or international experts judge applicants' achievements.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the association's senior membership requirements (10 years of professional practice and publication of papers) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and there was no showing that recognized national or international experts judge applicants' achievements. The petitioner's faculty position as dean was also insufficient because a university is not an association in the field, and the supporting letter was merely conclusory and inconsistent with an earlier letter from the same source.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B2203; source_row=17087 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
benefit to national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the petitioner's credentials, awards, and reference letters show local effectiveness but no past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. AAO rejects the argument that NCLBA's highly-qualified-teacher standard or DOL debarment of the prior employer creates a waiver, and rejects reliance on an unpublished approval of another teacher.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the petitioner's credentials, awards, and reference letters show local effectiveness but no past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. AAO rejects the argument that NCLBA's highly-qualified-teacher standard or DOL debarment of the prior employer creates a waiver, and rejects reliance on an unpublished approval of another teacher.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_04_B5203; source_row=17101 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest served to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the petitioner's citation record was minimal (only six citations of his doctoral dissertation, mostly from his home institution), witness letters largely speculated about future impact rather than established existing influence, post-filing evidence could not be used to show eligibility at time of filing, and the petitioner's employment at a federal agency did not constitute a blanket basis for the waiver.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's citation record was minimal (only six citations of his doctoral dissertation, mostly from his home institution), witness letters largely speculated about future impact rather than established existing influence, post-filing evidence could not be used to show eligibility at time of filing, and the petitioner's employment at a federal agency did not constitute a blanket basis for the waiver. The petitioner failed to establish that his work had influenced the field to the degree required for a national interest waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_03_B5203; source_row=17098 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c