Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 20921–20930
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded the witness letters were credible, specific, and corroborated; the proprietary nature of the petitioner's work explained the limited publication record; and the evidence demonstrated specific benefits arising from the beneficiary's work, satisfying the preponderance standard.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the witness letters were credible, specific, and corroborated; the proprietary nature of the petitioner's work explained the limited publication record; and the evidence demonstrated specific benefits arising from the beneficiary's work, satisfying the preponderance standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=17083 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Articles authored by the petitioner fall under the scholarly authorship criterion, not published material about the petitioner. Conference presentation evidence does not constitute published material about the petitioner relating to his work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Articles authored by the petitioner fall under the scholarly authorship criterion, not published material about the petitioner. Conference presentation evidence does not constitute published material about the petitioner relating to his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_01_B2203; source_row=17069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The research project did not demonstrate significant impact on the field; the untranslated webpage was inadmissible; invigilator duties did not constitute major contributions; and certifications were not explained as equating to contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The research project did not demonstrate significant impact on the field; the untranslated webpage was inadmissible; invigilator duties did not constitute major contributions; and certifications were not explained as equating to contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_01_B2203; source_row=17071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found unsupported counsel assertions did not establish a record of achievement with influence on the field as a whole, and noted that DOL had already approved a labor certification for the petitioner, undermining the argument that labor certification would harm the national interest.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found unsupported counsel assertions did not establish a record of achievement with influence on the field as a whole, and noted that DOL had already approved a labor certification for the petitioner, undermining the argument that labor certification would harm the national interest.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_01_B5203; source_row=17077 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the regulation does not require a NIW petitioner to show the position requires an advanced degree, and the documentation showed she qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the regulation does not require a NIW petitioner to show the position requires an advanced degree, and the documentation showed she qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_01_B5203; source_row=17074 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c