Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 20931–20940
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the benefits of the petitioner's work were limited to students at her school and not national in scope, citing NYSDOT's example that a single schoolteacher in one elementary school is not in the national interest. The post-filing research proposal could not be considered, and there was no evidence the awards had more than regional or institutional significance.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the benefits of the petitioner's work were limited to students at her school and not national in scope, citing NYSDOT's example that a single schoolteacher in one elementary school is not in the national interest. The post-filing research proposal could not be considered, and there was no evidence the awards had more than regional or institutional significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_01_B5203; source_row=17076 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics10 papers15 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
The petitioner established the intrinsic merit of his work in applied and computational mathematics, including numerical methods for PDEs, oceanographic modeling, and medical image analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner established the intrinsic merit of his work in applied and computational mathematics, including numerical methods for PDEs, oceanographic modeling, and medical image analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_02_B5203; source_row=17078 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics10 papers15 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's witness letters reflected high personal regard and future potential but did not demonstrate specific prior contributions that influenced the field as a whole. Citation evidence was weak, with at most four independent citations, and the petitioner's self-citations did not show influence on other researchers.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's witness letters reflected high personal regard and future potential but did not demonstrate specific prior contributions that influenced the field as a whole. Citation evidence was weak, with at most four independent citations, and the petitioner's self-citations did not show influence on other researchers. Evidence of conference presentations and claims of unique experience were insufficient to show existing impact distinguishing the petitioner from comparably qualified U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-15_02_B5203; source_row=17080 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree or foreign equivalent (including baccalaureate + 5 years progressive experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's three-year B.S. degree in Botany, Zoology, and Chemistry from India is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree. The submitted credential evaluations were inconsistent and conclusory, relying on the same data to reach different conclusions in 2011 and 2013, and the evaluators did not adequately address how the degree in an unrelated field equated to a computer science degree.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's three-year B.S. degree in Botany, Zoology, and Chemistry from India is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree. The submitted credential evaluations were inconsistent and conclusory, relying on the same data to reach different conclusions in 2011 and 2013, and the evaluators did not adequately address how the degree in an unrelated field equated to a computer science degree. Without a predicate finding that the beneficiary holds a foreign equivalent bachelor's degree, education plus experience cannot establish equivalency to a master's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=17064 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
degree in required field of study (Computer Science)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's degree is in Botany, Zoology, and Chemistry, not Computer Science, and there is no indication in the transcripts that any computer courses were taken. The degree is also a three-year degree that does not constitute the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's degree is in Botany, Zoology, and Chemistry, not Computer Science, and there is no indication in the transcripts that any computer courses were taken. The degree is also a three-year degree that does not constitute the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=17065 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of qualifying progressive experience per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
All six employer letters were brief and general, failing to provide specific descriptions of duties performed as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). They named positions and employment dates but lacked substantive detail about the beneficiary's actual work experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
All six employer letters were brief and general, failing to provide specific descriptions of duties performed as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). They named positions and employment dates but lacked substantive detail about the beneficiary's actual work experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=17066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner only established membership in a single association whose general membership is open to anyone actively involved in clinical research. Even treating the editorial board appointment as separate membership, the petitioner failed to show it requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, and in any event the appointment post-dated the petition filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner only established membership in a single association whose general membership is open to anyone actively involved in clinical research. Even treating the editorial board appointment as separate membership, the petitioner failed to show it requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, and in any event the appointment post-dated the petition filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-09_01_B2203; source_row=17049 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the record showed the beneficiary performed a leading or critical role for the petitioner, the petitioner failed to demonstrate it has a distinguished reputation. Additionally, the regulation requires such a role for more than one organization, and the petitioner only claimed the beneficiary's role with itself.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the record showed the beneficiary performed a leading or critical role for the petitioner, the petitioner failed to demonstrate it has a distinguished reputation. Additionally, the regulation requires such a role for more than one organization, and the petitioner only claimed the beneficiary's role with itself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-09_01_B2203; source_row=17054 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letter described the beneficiary's skills as unique but failed to explain how they constituted original contributions of major significance; many claims were speculative about future impact. Recommendation letters only showed impact on the employing organization, not the field as a whole. No documentary evidence supported the FDA approval claims or algorithm claims.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letter described the beneficiary's skills as unique but failed to explain how they constituted original contributions of major significance; many claims were speculative about future impact. Recommendation letters only showed impact on the employing organization, not the field as a whole. No documentary evidence supported the FDA approval claims or algorithm claims.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-09_01_B2203; source_row=17052 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c