Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 20981–20990
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
Counsel did not contest this criterion in the motion to reopen/reconsider and offered no specific analysis of evidence or legal authority on appeal beyond passing references, so the issue was deemed abandoned.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Counsel did not contest this criterion in the motion to reopen/reconsider and offered no specific analysis of evidence or legal authority on appeal beyond passing references, so the issue was deemed abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17018 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Counsel did not provide additional evidence or identify errors of law or fact in the director's analysis in the appellate brief, so the AAO considered the claim abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Counsel did not provide additional evidence or identify errors of law or fact in the director's analysis in the appellate brief, so the AAO considered the claim abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17015 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that there is sufficient documentation that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the regulation through his research proposal and manuscript review positions.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that there is sufficient documentation that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the regulation through his research proposal and manuscript review positions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17017 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
What the decision said
Counsel provided no additional evidence or discussion identifying errors of law or fact in the director's analysis on appeal, so the claim was deemed abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Counsel provided no additional evidence or discussion identifying errors of law or fact in the director's analysis on appeal, so the claim was deemed abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17020 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements for this criterion, and the record supports the director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements for this criterion, and the record supports the director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17019 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The director failed to discuss the petitioner's claim of major contributions. The AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's publications were frequently cited, had significantly influenced business practices, or otherwise constituted original contributions of major significance. The finding was further undermined by the petitioner's false authorship claims.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The director failed to discuss the petitioner's claim of major contributions. The AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's publications were frequently cited, had significantly influenced business practices, or otherwise constituted original contributions of major significance. The finding was further undermined by the petitioner's false authorship claims.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_01_B2203; source_row=16999 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO noted the director erroneously found no evidence had been submitted, but nonetheless agreed with the ultimate denial. The submitted articles lacked full certified English translations, failed to identify authors or dates, and lacked evidence establishing the publications as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO noted the director erroneously found no evidence had been submitted, but nonetheless agreed with the ultimate denial. The submitted articles lacked full certified English translations, failed to identify authors or dates, and lacked evidence establishing the publications as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_01_B2203; source_row=16998 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification requires advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the 'or equivalent' modifier on the labor certification, combined with the 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h)(4)(ii) language, allows qualification with less than a full bachelor's degree, defeating advanced degree professional classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the 'or equivalent' modifier on the labor certification, combined with the 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h)(4)(ii) language, allows qualification with less than a full bachelor's degree, defeating advanced degree professional classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_04_B5203; source_row=17012 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate (single-source degree)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO distinguished the cited 2010 AAO decision because there the labor certification did not require an advanced degree, whereas here both the labor certification and the I-140 do. The beneficiary's examination certificates from a professional association do not constitute a foreign equivalent degree from an accredited college or university.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO distinguished the cited 2010 AAO decision because there the labor certification did not require an advanced degree, whereas here both the labor certification and the I-140 do. The beneficiary's examination certificates from a professional association do not constitute a foreign equivalent degree from an accredited college or university.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_03_B5203; source_row=17009 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest served substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials and activities reflect exceptional ability at most, but exceptional ability is not grounds for the waiver. Her involvement in programs like Reading Together did not extend beyond the local level and did not establish impact and influence sufficient to distinguish her from qualified U.S. workers.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials and activities reflect exceptional ability at most, but exceptional ability is not grounds for the waiver. Her involvement in programs like Reading Together did not extend beyond the local level and did not establish impact and influence sufficient to distinguish her from qualified U.S. workers. National Board Certification was received after the filing date and reflects additional training rather than national-level impact. Evidence of national dissemination (blog, articles, future conference) arose after the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=17005 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c