Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21141–21150

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences27 papers137 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's citation evidence was ambiguous and insufficient. Expert letters were largely near-identical, suggesting they were not authored by the purported writers, and relied on future-tense language about potential rather than demonstrated current impact. Post-filing materials (provisional patents, media reports) could not be considered.…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's citation evidence was ambiguous and insufficient. Expert letters were largely near-identical, suggesting they were not authored by the purported writers, and relied on future-tense language about potential rather than demonstrated current impact. Post-filing materials (provisional patents, media reports) could not be considered. Conference participation and publication alone do not constitute contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=16817
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Social SciencesBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner's awards are local or state-level in significance, her letters of support do not show influence on the field as a whole, and she has not demonstrated a past history of achievement with some degree of influence on the field nationally. The inapplicability of labor certification due to employer debarment cannot substitute for the required showing of individual merit.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's awards are local or state-level in significance, her letters of support do not show influence on the field as a whole, and she has not demonstrated a past history of achievement with some degree of influence on the field nationally. The inapplicability of labor certification due to employer debarment cannot substitute for the required showing of individual merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_06_B5203; source_row=16831
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the school lacks DOE/CHEA-recognized regional accreditation (WASC), that state BPPE approval is a lower-level endorsement with no guarantee of nationwide degree recognition, and that DHS approval for F-1 enrollment is entirely unrelated to advanced-degree classification requirements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the school lacks DOE/CHEA-recognized regional accreditation (WASC), that state BPPE approval is a lower-level endorsement with no guarantee of nationwide degree recognition, and that DHS approval for F-1 enrollment is entirely unrelated to advanced-degree classification requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_07_B5203; source_row=16832
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

labor certification requires advanced degree professional

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification's alternative paths (including 24 months in an alternate occupation) permit qualification without a baccalaureate plus five years of progressive experience, defeating advanced degree classification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification's alternative paths (including 24 months in an alternate occupation) permit qualification without a baccalaureate plus five years of progressive experience, defeating advanced degree classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_01_B5203; source_row=16820
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / StatisticsFaculty

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

benefit to national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found no evidence comparing petitioner's performance with other teachers or showing impact beyond her schools; advanced degrees and length of experience are factors for the underlying classification, not for the waiver, and recommendation letters did not address the NYSDOT framework.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found no evidence comparing petitioner's performance with other teachers or showing impact beyond her schools; advanced degrees and length of experience are factors for the underlying classification, not for the waiver, and recommendation letters did not address the NYSDOT framework.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_08_B5203; source_row=16837
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social SciencesBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the benefits of the petitioner's work as a special educator are limited to students at her school and are so attenuated at the national level as to be negligible. General arguments about the importance of education or closing the achievement gap address only the intrinsic merit prong, not the national scope requirement.…

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the benefits of the petitioner's work as a special educator are limited to students at her school and are so attenuated at the national level as to be negligible. General arguments about the importance of education or closing the achievement gap address only the intrinsic merit prong, not the national scope requirement. Individual teachers do not produce benefits national in scope merely by contributing to a nationally important field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_06_B5203; source_row=16830
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social SciencesBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a special educator is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's finding.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a special educator is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_06_B5203; source_row=16829
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner submitted no financial documentation (tax returns, annual reports, or audited financial statements) covering the period from the priority date, and made no claim to have paid wages to the beneficiary, leaving the continuing ability-to-pay requirement undemonstrated.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted no financial documentation (tax returns, annual reports, or audited financial statements) covering the period from the priority date, and made no claim to have paid wages to the beneficiary, leaving the continuing ability-to-pay requirement undemonstrated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_07_B5203; source_row=16834
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary meets labor certification educational requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Because the beneficiary's degree from the unaccredited institution does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree and she has no foreign equivalent, she fails to meet the minimum educational requirements stated in Part H of the ETA Form 9089.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because the beneficiary's degree from the unaccredited institution does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree and she has no foreign equivalent, she fails to meet the minimum educational requirements stated in Part H of the ETA Form 9089.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_07_B5203; source_row=16833
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary's qualifying experience under ETA Form 9089

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this as an additional ground beyond the director's decision, finding the beneficiary's experience with the petitioner was substantially comparable to the proffered web developer/software engineer position and therefore unusable to satisfy the 72-month experience requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this as an additional ground beyond the director's decision, finding the beneficiary's experience with the petitioner was substantially comparable to the proffered web developer/software engineer position and therefore unusable to satisfy the 72-month experience requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_02_B5203; source_row=16824
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment