Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21151–21160

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay because the wages paid were $71,260 below the proffered wage, requested tax returns/audited financial statements were not produced, and the record contained unresolved inconsistencies about the number of employees.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay because the wages paid were $71,260 below the proffered wage, requested tax returns/audited financial statements were not produced, and the record contained unresolved inconsistencies about the number of employees.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_02_B5203; source_row=16823
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Net income sufficient to cover difference between wages paid and proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 2011 tax return (covering the period including the priority date) showed net income of only $16,601, which is insufficient to cover the difference between the actual wage paid and the proffered wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 2011 tax return (covering the period including the priority date) showed net income of only $16,601, which is insufficient to cover the difference between the actual wage paid and the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_04_B5203; source_row=16826
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Net current assets sufficient to cover proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's net current assets for the fiscal year including the priority date were negative at -$27,516, which is insufficient to demonstrate ability to pay the proffered wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's net current assets for the fiscal year including the priority date were negative at -$27,516, which is insufficient to demonstrate ability to pay the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_04_B5203; source_row=16827
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Totality of circumstances under Matter of Sonegawa

Why AAO was not persuaded

Over ten years, only one fiscal year had net income or net current assets exceeding the proffered wage. No evidence showed the sole shareholder was willing to forego officer compensation, no evidence of the petitioner's industry reputation was submitted, and the bank statements did not demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. The totality of circumstances did not support a finding of ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Over ten years, only one fiscal year had net income or net current assets exceeding the proffered wage. No evidence showed the sole shareholder was willing to forego officer compensation, no evidence of the petitioner's industry reputation was submitted, and the bank statements did not demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. The totality of circumstances did not support a finding of ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_04_B5203; source_row=16828
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Wages paid to beneficiary equal to or exceeding proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner submitted a 2012 W-2 showing the beneficiary was paid $89,496, which is less than the proffered wage of $120,000, so the petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the $30,504 difference.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted a 2012 W-2 showing the beneficiary was paid $89,496, which is less than the proffered wage of $120,000, so the petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the $30,504 difference.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_04_B5203; source_row=16825
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences27 papers137 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the director and the AAO found the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of scholarly article authorship.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Both the director and the AAO found the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of scholarly article authorship.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=16818
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences27 papers137 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the director and the AAO found sufficient evidence that the petitioner participated as a judge of others' work in the field.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Both the director and the AAO found sufficient evidence that the petitioner participated as a judge of others' work in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_01_B2203; source_row=16816
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary possesses experience required by labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

Discrepancies between the two employer letters and the ETA Form 9089 regarding dates and titles, and the absence of full-time/part-time designation, were not resolved.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Discrepancies between the two employer letters and the ETA Form 9089 regarding dates and titles, and the absence of full-time/part-time designation, were not resolved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_01_B5203; source_row=16821
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / StatisticsFaculty

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that teaching mathematics and science has substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that teaching mathematics and science has substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_08_B5203; source_row=16835
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / StatisticsFaculty

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded that the benefits of a high school teacher's work are limited to her local students and school and do not extend nationally; aggregate national effects from many teachers do not give national scope to one teacher's work.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the benefits of a high school teacher's work are limited to her local students and school and do not extend nationally; aggregate national effects from many teachers do not give national scope to one teacher's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-26_08_B5203; source_row=16836
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment