Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The petitioner's field is not the performing arts, so this criterion does not apply on its face. The petitioner did not establish grounds for applying the comparable evidence provision at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), and even if she had, letters attesting to undocumented revenue amounts are not comparable to objective box-office or sales records.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's field is not the performing arts, so this criterion does not apply on its face. The petitioner did not establish grounds for applying the comparable evidence provision at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), and even if she had, letters attesting to undocumented revenue amounts are not comparable to objective box-office or sales records.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=16773 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not show the RSS implementation was an original contribution (counsel conceded she did not invent RSS), did not submit documentary evidence that the field was not already using the technology, and the letters were conclusory or contained near-identical language suggesting they were not authored independently.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not show the RSS implementation was an original contribution (counsel conceded she did not invent RSS), did not submit documentary evidence that the field was not already using the technology, and the letters were conclusory or contained near-identical language suggesting they were not authored independently. Front-page articles also do not automatically constitute original contributions of major significance. Additionally, the regulation requires plural contributions and the petitioner showed at most one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=16769 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serve national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected counsel's argument that a known shortage of qualified educators for the Hispanic population makes the petitioner more influential than a similarly qualified U.S. worker, observing that labor certification is itself designed to identify and address worker shortages. AAO also gave reduced weight to witness letters with strikingly similar wording suggesting a common drafter.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected counsel's argument that a known shortage of qualified educators for the Hispanic population makes the petitioner more influential than a similarly qualified U.S. worker, observing that labor certification is itself designed to identify and address worker shortages. AAO also gave reduced weight to witness letters with strikingly similar wording suggesting a common drafter.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=16778 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner conceded during the RFE response that her articles were not scholarly and made no claim on appeal, so the issue was considered abandoned.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner conceded during the RFE response that her articles were not scholarly and made no claim on appeal, so the issue was considered abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=16770 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO accepted that the petitioner's occupation, addressing barriers facing immigrant and U.S.-born children of immigrants, has substantial intrinsic merit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted that the petitioner's occupation, addressing barriers facing immigrant and U.S.-born children of immigrants, has substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=16776 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that giving conference presentations in several states did not establish national impact, that claims about the petitioner's role in a White House-related summit lacked supporting evidence, and that 'countrywide potential' is speculative and insufficient at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that giving conference presentations in several states did not establish national impact, that claims about the petitioner's role in a White House-related summit lacked supporting evidence, and that 'countrywide potential' is speculative and insufficient at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=16777 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets minimum experience requirements of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The RIBS Integrations letter contradicts information on the ETA 750B; the second employment letter fails to describe duties; H-1B letters are prospective only; and the beneficiary's affidavit is self-serving. Regulations require employer letters with name, address, title, and specific duty descriptions, none of which were adequately provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The RIBS Integrations letter contradicts information on the ETA 750B; the second employment letter fails to describe duties; H-1B letters are prospective only; and the beneficiary's affidavit is self-serving. Regulations require employer letters with name, address, title, and specific duty descriptions, none of which were adequately provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-17_01_B5203; source_row=16764 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner paid the full proffered wage in 2004 but paid less than the full wage in 2005–2007. The predecessor's 2005 tax return was never submitted; the petitioner's 2005 tax return showed $0 in wages and income. Net income was $0 or negative for 2005–2007, and net current assets were insufficient in 2005.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner paid the full proffered wage in 2004 but paid less than the full wage in 2005–2007. The predecessor's 2005 tax return was never submitted; the petitioner's 2005 tax return showed $0 in wages and income. Net income was $0 or negative for 2005–2007, and net current assets were insufficient in 2005. Management-fee arguments and the totality-of-circumstances argument were rejected because no supporting tax returns confirmed the fees and the petitioner showed no historical growth or reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-17_01_B5203; source_row=16763 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c