Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The beneficiary's ownership and control over the predecessor and petitioner, combined with the Modular Container Systems analysis (seven of nine criteria met), confirms undue influence over the job opportunity. The board member's letter undermined the petitioner's own case by revealing the beneficiary held a different title than the offered position and that the SAP Manager position did not appear on the staff list.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's ownership and control over the predecessor and petitioner, combined with the Modular Container Systems analysis (seven of nine criteria met), confirms undue influence over the job opportunity. The board member's letter undermined the petitioner's own case by revealing the beneficiary held a different title than the offered position and that the SAP Manager position did not appear on the staff list.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-17_01_B5203; source_row=16765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found it more likely than not that the petitioner had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward, based on the full record including evidence submitted on appeal and motion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found it more likely than not that the petitioner had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward, based on the full record including evidence submitted on appeal and motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-16_01_B5203; source_row=16761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the submitted evidence establishes that the beneficiary had all the education, training, and experience specified on the ETA 9089 as of the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the submitted evidence establishes that the beneficiary had all the education, training, and experience specified on the ETA 9089 as of the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-16_01_B5203; source_row=16762 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letters were largely conclusory and focused on future potential rather than already-realized significant impact. Citation counts were moderate and not indicative of major significance; patents and patent applications lacked evidence of broad field impact. The evidence showed the petitioner is a talented researcher with potential but not one who had already made contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letters were largely conclusory and focused on future potential rather than already-realized significant impact. Citation counts were moderate and not indicative of major significance; patents and patent applications lacked evidence of broad field impact. The evidence showed the petitioner is a talented researcher with potential but not one who had already made contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_03_B2203; source_row=16755 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to claim this criterion before the director. The trade show evidence was submitted for the first time on appeal, cannot be considered as a new eligibility claim, and in any event postdates the filing date. Counsel also failed to explain how a trade show constitutes an artistic exhibition or showcase.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to claim this criterion before the director. The trade show evidence was submitted for the first time on appeal, cannot be considered as a new eligibility claim, and in any event postdates the filing date. Counsel also failed to explain how a trade show constitutes an artistic exhibition or showcase.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=16748 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Two of the four articles do not mention the petitioner by name and cannot be 'about' the petitioner; one mentions him briefly; none satisfy the plain language requirement. The website has not been established as professional or major trade publication or major media, being a private attorney's personal website. A supplemental journal article postdates the filing and its translation is incomplete.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Two of the four articles do not mention the petitioner by name and cannot be 'about' the petitioner; one mentions him briefly; none satisfy the plain language requirement. The website has not been established as professional or major trade publication or major media, being a private attorney's personal website. A supplemental journal article postdates the filing and its translation is incomplete.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=16744 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Expert letters are largely conclusory, vague, or speculative about future impact rather than demonstrating existing impact on the field. Letters with nearly identical language undermine credibility. Patents alone do not establish major significance. Company interest letters describe prospective plans rather than adopted innovations.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Expert letters are largely conclusory, vague, or speculative about future impact rather than demonstrating existing impact on the field. Letters with nearly identical language undermine credibility. Patents alone do not establish major significance. Company interest letters describe prospective plans rather than adopted innovations. None of the evidence establishes that the petitioner has already had an impact in his field consistent with contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=16746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not claim this criterion before the director, the membership postdates the filing date, and the admission letter does not establish that the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not claim this criterion before the director, the membership postdates the filing date, and the admission letter does not establish that the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=16743 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence establishing the company's distinguished reputation, and furthermore only claimed a role at a single organization while the regulation requires evidence of organizations or establishments in the plural.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence establishing the company's distinguished reputation, and furthermore only claimed a role at a single organization while the regulation requires evidence of organizations or establishments in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=16749 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The private website does not constitute a professional or major trade publication or other major media, nor does it conduct rigorous peer review. Supplemental articles fail to establish publication dates predating the filing date. One article is on patent strategy rather than in the petitioner's field of biological engineering.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The private website does not constitute a professional or major trade publication or other major media, nor does it conduct rigorous peer review. Supplemental articles fail to establish publication dates predating the filing date. One article is on patent strategy rather than in the petitioner's field of biological engineering.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=16747 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c