Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary possesses required degree in the major field listed on labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The ETA Form 9089 required a master's or bachelor's degree in education. The beneficiary held only a bachelor's in Chemical Engineering. The petitioner explicitly indicated no alternate field of study was acceptable, and USCIS must apply the plain language of the labor certification without adding or altering requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The ETA Form 9089 required a master's or bachelor's degree in education. The beneficiary held only a bachelor's in Chemical Engineering. The petitioner explicitly indicated no alternate field of study was acceptable, and USCIS must apply the plain language of the labor certification without adding or altering requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-28_10_B5203; source_row=16714 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner had no wages paid to the beneficiary, negative net income, and negative net current assets in 2011. The unaudited financial statement was inadmissible and Sonegawa factors did not help the petitioner given its brief history and minimal operations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner had no wages paid to the beneficiary, negative net income, and negative net current assets in 2011. The unaudited financial statement was inadmissible and Sonegawa factors did not help the petitioner given its brief history and minimal operations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-28_01_B5203; source_row=16703 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
minimum education requirements per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary holds a bachelor's degree in political science, not marketing. The labor certification required a degree in marketing or a related field, explicitly prohibited alternate fields of study, and did not permit experience to substitute for the required field. The credential evaluation relied on an H-1B provision inapplicable to immigrant visa petitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary holds a bachelor's degree in political science, not marketing. The labor certification required a degree in marketing or a related field, explicitly prohibited alternate fields of study, and did not permit experience to substitute for the required field. The credential evaluation relied on an H-1B provision inapplicable to immigrant visa petitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-28_01_B5203; source_row=16704 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to specifically address how his proposed work as an attorney would be national in scope. AAO noted that NYSDOT explicitly states the pro bono services of a single lawyer are too attenuated at the national level, and the published material submitted about affordable legal services did not relate to the petitioner personally.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to specifically address how his proposed work as an attorney would be national in scope. AAO noted that NYSDOT explicitly states the pro bono services of a single lawyer are too attenuated at the national level, and the published material submitted about affordable legal services did not relate to the petitioner personally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-28_09_B5203; source_row=16712 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to address how he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications, and submitted none of the types of evidence the USCIS entrepreneur guidance identifies as relevant.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to address how he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications, and submitted none of the types of evidence the USCIS entrepreneur guidance identifies as relevant.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-28_09_B5203; source_row=16713 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets educational requirement of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record contained only a copy of the degree certificate but no official transcripts or university records confirming award of the degree as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3)(ii).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contained only a copy of the degree certificate but no official transcripts or university records confirming award of the degree as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3)(ii).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-27_04_B5203; source_row=16688 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets experience requirement of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employment letters in the record did not comply with 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3)(ii)(A) because they lacked job titles, specific employment dates, and full-time status descriptions. Only one letter—covering approximately two years and five months—was accepted as qualifying evidence, which was insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employment letters in the record did not comply with 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(l)(3)(ii)(A) because they lacked job titles, specific employment dates, and full-time status descriptions. Only one letter—covering approximately two years and five months—was accepted as qualifying evidence, which was insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-27_04_B5203; source_row=16689 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO confirmed that when accounting for all sponsored beneficiaries, the combined proffered wages exceeded the petitioner's net income and net current assets in each relevant year from 2003–2006. Bank statements, the owner's personal assets and real estate, and lines of credit were rejected. The petitioner also failed to substantiate the claim that the beneficiary was replacing an outside-service worker with the same duties.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO confirmed that when accounting for all sponsored beneficiaries, the combined proffered wages exceeded the petitioner's net income and net current assets in each relevant year from 2003–2006. Bank statements, the owner's personal assets and real estate, and lines of credit were rejected. The petitioner also failed to substantiate the claim that the beneficiary was replacing an outside-service worker with the same duties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-27_04_B5203; source_row=16687 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed petitioner could not pay through wages or net income, rejected reliance on third-party program funds, related-entity income, and the sole member's personal AGI, and found no Sonegawa-type circumstances.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed petitioner could not pay through wages or net income, rejected reliance on third-party program funds, related-entity income, and the sole member's personal AGI, and found no Sonegawa-type circumstances.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-27_06_B5203; source_row=16693 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c