Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 21291–21300
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Membership
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
Academy candidacy, OYL Selection Committee service, and ABA Day at the UN delegation participation all post-dated the filing date and could not be considered. Regardless, none of these equates to membership in an association requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Academy candidacy, OYL Selection Committee service, and ABA Day at the UN delegation participation all post-dated the filing date and could not be considered. Regardless, none of these equates to membership in an association requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The comparable evidence argument also failed because the petitioner addressed more than half the criteria and did not explain why the standard criteria were inapplicable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=16643 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Member News announcement is not a scholarly article (not peer-reviewed, no references). The three scholarly articles post-dated the filing date and could not be considered. Additionally, the criterion requires authorship in the plural of publications, and the petitioner offered only one.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Member News announcement is not a scholarly article (not peer-reviewed, no references). The three scholarly articles post-dated the filing date and could not be considered. Additionally, the criterion requires authorship in the plural of publications, and the petitioner offered only one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=16647 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Foreign-language articles were accompanied by a deficient blanket translation and had no evidentiary value; English articles lacked circulation/distribution evidence; and self-serving claims of circulation in an editor's letter were not accepted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Foreign-language articles were accompanied by a deficient blanket translation and had no evidentiary value; English articles lacked circulation/distribution evidence; and self-serving claims of circulation in an editor's letter were not accepted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_01_B2203; source_row=16636 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the supporting letters were not primary evidence of national or international recognition, the petitioner did not establish significance of the publication, foreign-language documents had deficient blanket translations, and discrepancies regarding award dates were unresolved.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the supporting letters were not primary evidence of national or international recognition, the petitioner did not establish significance of the publication, foreign-language documents had deficient blanket translations, and discrepancies regarding award dates were unresolved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_01_B2203; source_row=16635 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's 2008 tax return showed negative net income and negative net current assets well below the $102,000 proffered wage, no wages were paid to the beneficiary in 2008, and the Sonegawa exception was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2008 tax return showed negative net income and negative net current assets well below the $102,000 proffered wage, no wages were paid to the beneficiary in 2008, and the Sonegawa exception was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_02_B5203; source_row=16652 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evaluator's conclusions lacked substantiation because the employment statements were internally inconsistent, contradicted the beneficiary's sworn ETA Form 9089 statements, and failed to show the required 60 months of experience designing and planning mechanical systems.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evaluator's conclusions lacked substantiation because the employment statements were internally inconsistent, contradicted the beneficiary's sworn ETA Form 9089 statements, and failed to show the required 60 months of experience designing and planning mechanical systems.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_02_B5203; source_row=16651 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
60 months experience in alternate occupations (Accountant, Financial Analyst, Auditor, or Financial Manager)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letter for one employer described duties inconsistent with a finance manager or accounting supervisor and contained a conflicting employment start date. The reference letter for the second employer failed to provide a specific description of duties as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The reference letter for one employer described duties inconsistent with a finance manager or accounting supervisor and contained a conflicting employment start date. The reference letter for the second employer failed to provide a specific description of duties as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). The third revised letter on appeal lacked letterhead, omitted explanation for the revised duty descriptions, and appeared designed to cure deficiencies after the fact, undermining its credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_03_B5203; source_row=16654 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
60 months experience as Operations Research Analyst
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's experience with the petitioner (about 7 months) was in the same position as the one offered, making it substantially comparable and therefore unusable as qualifying experience under DOL regulations. No other qualifying Operations Research Analyst experience was documented.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's experience with the petitioner (about 7 months) was in the same position as the one offered, making it substantially comparable and therefore unusable as qualifying experience under DOL regulations. No other qualifying Operations Research Analyst experience was documented.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_03_B5203; source_row=16653 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Statutory field eligibility (sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO raised this issue sua sponte and found that the practice of law is a profession under EB-2, not within the enumerated EB-1A fields, rendering the petitioner statutorily ineligible regardless of the evidentiary criteria analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte and found that the practice of law is a profession under EB-2, not within the enumerated EB-1A fields, rendering the petitioner statutorily ineligible regardless of the evidentiary criteria analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=16650 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c