Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21331–21340

EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearch Scientist

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO withdrew the director's finding because this criterion is limited to the visual arts and the petitioner, as a scientist presenting at scientific conferences, does not qualify. Conference presentations are not artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding because this criterion is limited to the visual arts and the petitioner, as a scientist presenting at scientific conferences, does not qualify. Conference presentations are not artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=16613
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearch Scientist

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner submitted citation articles, but articles that cite to the petitioner's work are primarily about the authors' own research, not about the petitioner himself, and thus do not satisfy the plain language of the regulation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted citation articles, but articles that cite to the petitioner's work are primarily about the authors' own research, not about the petitioner himself, and thus do not satisfy the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=16610
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearch Scientist

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

The totality of evidence, including publications, citations, reference letters, and other documentation, does not demonstrate that the petitioner enjoys sustained national or international acclaim or has risen to the very top of the field of medicinal chemistry research.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The totality of evidence, including publications, citations, reference letters, and other documentation, does not demonstrate that the petitioner enjoys sustained national or international acclaim or has risen to the very top of the field of medicinal chemistry research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=16616
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearch Scientist

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that the reference letters largely offered conclusory or speculative statements about future impact, that citations to the petitioner's articles were minimal to moderate (none exceeding 17 independent cites), and that there was no documentary evidence showing the petitioner's work had already resulted in successful treatments or was otherwise of major significance at the t…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that the reference letters largely offered conclusory or speculative statements about future impact, that citations to the petitioner's articles were minimal to moderate (none exceeding 17 independent cites), and that there was no documentary evidence showing the petitioner's work had already resulted in successful treatments or was otherwise of major significance at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=16611
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearch Scientist

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's salary evidence showed earnings well below the top-ten-percent threshold cited by BLS, and his salary comparisons were drawn from a limited sample of local H-1B positions rather than the field as a whole.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's salary evidence showed earnings well below the top-ten-percent threshold cited by BLS, and his salary comparisons were drawn from a limited sample of local H-1B positions rather than the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=16615
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical EngineeringResearch Scientist

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner documented co-authorship of four published peer-reviewed journal articles, satisfying the plain language of this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner documented co-authorship of four published peer-reviewed journal articles, satisfying the plain language of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=16612
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

U.S. baccalaureate or foreign equivalent degree from a college or university (plus 5 years progressive experience)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concludes the three-year B.Com is not a foreign equivalent degree, and the Associate Membership is not a degree from a college or university. Even the petitioner's own evaluators conceded the issuing body is not a college or university in the traditional sense.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the three-year B.Com is not a foreign equivalent degree, and the Associate Membership is not a degree from a college or university. Even the petitioner's own evaluators conceded the issuing body is not a college or university in the traditional sense.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-18_02_B5203; source_row=16604
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the key NYSDOT provision requires a record of influence on the field as a whole, which does not require comparing credentials but rather demonstrating field-wide impact. The petitioner's evidence did not document the extent to which she raised student achievement or show that her work had influence beyond the school districts where she worked.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the key NYSDOT provision requires a record of influence on the field as a whole, which does not require comparing credentials but rather demonstrating field-wide impact. The petitioner's evidence did not document the extent to which she raised student achievement or show that her work had influence beyond the school districts where she worked. Additionally, conflicting information in the record cast doubt on her claims.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-18_03_B5203; source_row=16607
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO implicitly accepted that science education has substantial intrinsic merit, noting that the submitted materials 'establish the intrinsic merit of science education,' but found this alone insufficient for the waiver.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO implicitly accepted that science education has substantial intrinsic merit, noting that the submitted materials 'establish the intrinsic merit of science education,' but found this alone insufficient for the waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-18_03_B5203; source_row=16605
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the national importance of education as a concept or educators as a class does not establish that one teacher's work produces benefits national in scope. A local-scale contribution to an overall national effort does not meet the NYSDOT threshold, and the aggregate national effect from thousands of teachers does not give national scope to the work of each individual teacher.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the national importance of education as a concept or educators as a class does not establish that one teacher's work produces benefits national in scope. A local-scale contribution to an overall national effort does not meet the NYSDOT threshold, and the aggregate national effect from thousands of teachers does not give national scope to the work of each individual teacher.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-18_03_B5203; source_row=16606
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment