Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 21381–21390
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO accepted the intrinsic merit of science education, consistent with the director's finding.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO accepted the intrinsic merit of science education, consistent with the director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_12_B5203; source_row=16576 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
benefit national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO determined that the petitioner's record—science-fair successes by his students, a one-time grant, and AP program participation—does not demonstrate influence on other science educators or projected national benefit.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO determined that the petitioner's record—science-fair successes by his students, a one-time grant, and AP program participation—does not demonstrate influence on other science educators or projected national benefit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_12_B5203; source_row=16578 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO concluded that the petitioner's impact has not extended beyond the students he personally instructs and the materials submitted do not show his methods or curricula are adopted nationally.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO concluded that the petitioner's impact has not extended beyond the students he personally instructs and the materials submitted do not show his methods or curricula are adopted nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_12_B5203; source_row=16577 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The national benefit from education as a general concept does not lend national scope to the work of one teacher. No federal legislation creates specific provisions granting blanket waivers to teachers, and the petitioner's evidence showed impact limited to local school districts.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The national benefit from education as a general concept does not lend national scope to the work of one teacher. No federal legislation creates specific provisions granting blanket waivers to teachers, and the petitioner's evidence showed impact limited to local school districts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_08_B5203; source_row=16569 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
What the decision said
AAO did not separately analyze this prong, instead focusing on national scope and whether the petitioner's contributions serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately analyze this prong, instead focusing on national scope and whether the petitioner's contributions serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_08_B5203; source_row=16568 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's qualifying experience per labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
Additional evidence submitted on appeal established by a preponderance of the evidence that the beneficiary possessed the required experience as of the priority date, warranting withdrawal of the director's decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Additional evidence submitted on appeal established by a preponderance of the evidence that the beneficiary possessed the required experience as of the priority date, warranting withdrawal of the director's decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_11_B5203; source_row=16575 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the appeal-stage evidence established, under a totality-of-circumstances analysis, that the petitioner had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date forward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the appeal-stage evidence established, under a totality-of-circumstances analysis, that the petitioner had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date forward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-10_10_B5203; source_row=16574 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that expert letters speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating current major significance at the time of filing, citation counts were minimal to moderate (no article cited more than 29 times), and publications alone are insufficient without evidence that they are of 'major significance' in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that expert letters speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating current major significance at the time of filing, citation counts were minimal to moderate (no article cited more than 29 times), and publications alone are insufficient without evidence that they are of 'major significance' in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-07_01_B2203; source_row=16549 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c