Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 2141–2150
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual
What the decision said
Petitioner did not address the criterion at (iii) on appeal; AAO notes the RFE response appeared to incorrectly reference (iii) when discussing evidence pertinent to (vi).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not address the criterion at (iii) on appeal; AAO notes the RFE response appeared to incorrectly reference (iii) when discussing evidence pertinent to (vi).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_01_B2203; source_row=41948 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the evidence focused on the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor, and that generalized claims and unsupported projections about job creation and tax contributions did not show broader implications or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the evidence focused on the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor, and that generalized claims and unsupported projections about job creation and tax contributions did not show broader implications or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_03_B5203; source_row=41971 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new evidence shows entrepreneurship experience but does not cure the other deficiencies the Director identified, so the Petitioner has not established a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in her fields.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new evidence shows entrepreneurship experience but does not cure the other deficiencies the Director identified, so the Petitioner has not established a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in her fields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_04_B5203; source_row=41974 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The opinion letters contained only conclusory section headers without substantive support specific to the Petitioner's endeavor, discussing only the hospitality industry broadly. Generalized articles and the Petitioner's prior academic and employment experience are immaterial to whether the specific proposed endeavor has national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The opinion letters contained only conclusory section headers without substantive support specific to the Petitioner's endeavor, discussing only the hospitality industry broadly. Generalized articles and the Petitioner's prior academic and employment experience are immaterial to whether the specific proposed endeavor has national importance. The record does not establish any particular innovation distinguishable from current practices or any quantified employment or economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=41908 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that no documentary evidence identified the Petitioner as an IAENG member. Additionally, the Petitioner's own description of IAENG admitted undergraduate students, undermining any claim that membership requires outstanding achievements. The highest fellowship tier might qualify but the Petitioner never specifically claimed or documented fellow membership.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that no documentary evidence identified the Petitioner as an IAENG member. Additionally, the Petitioner's own description of IAENG admitted undergraduate students, undermining any claim that membership requires outstanding achievements. The highest fellowship tier might qualify but the Petitioner never specifically claimed or documented fellow membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_04_B2203; source_row=41928 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record does not show sustained acclaim: competition results lack context (total participants per classification, total competitions entered, unexplained multi-year gaps), the black belt degree is not reliably indicative of elite competitive status, post-filing evidence cannot establish eligibility, and the opinion letter is contradicted by the objective record and thus given diminished weight.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record does not show sustained acclaim: competition results lack context (total participants per classification, total competitions entered, unexplained multi-year gaps), the black belt degree is not reliably indicative of elite competitive status, post-filing evidence cannot establish eligibility, and the opinion letter is contradicted by the objective record and thus given diminished weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_03_B2203; source_row=41924 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's business plan, recommendation letters, and industry articles failed to establish national importance. The letters addressed the Petitioner's experience rather than the national significance of the endeavor, and the industry articles discussed martial arts broadly rather than the specific proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's business plan, recommendation letters, and industry articles failed to establish national importance. The letters addressed the Petitioner's experience rather than the national significance of the endeavor, and the industry articles discussed martial arts broadly rather than the specific proposed endeavor. The claimed national shortage of business professionals is not, by itself, sufficient to show national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_02_B5203; source_row=41911 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the director that the endeavor lacks substantial merit, finding it falls within health/business areas contemplated by Dhanasar. However, AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: her evidence addressed broad topics and national initiatives rather than showing how her specific local home care enterprise would have broader field-level or national economic implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director that the endeavor lacks substantial merit, finding it falls within health/business areas contemplated by Dhanasar. However, AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: her evidence addressed broad topics and national initiatives rather than showing how her specific local home care enterprise would have broader field-level or national economic implications. Business plan revenue ($539K–$1.5M) and job creation (7–21 positions) projections were uncorroborated and not shown to have substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_08_B5203; source_row=41945 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the record lacks corroborating evidence for the projected employment and financial figures, and that the proposed teaching/consulting activities do not rise to the level of national importance because they would not impact the IT field more broadly beyond individual clients; the relevant inquiry is the specific endeavor, not the importance of the IT industry at large.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the record lacks corroborating evidence for the projected employment and financial figures, and that the proposed teaching/consulting activities do not rise to the level of national importance because they would not impact the IT field more broadly beyond individual clients; the relevant inquiry is the specific endeavor, not the importance of the IT industry at large.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_07_B5203; source_row=41942 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c