Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 21541–21550
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO rejected the argument that enactment of the NCLBA made math teaching inherently national in scope, noting that all employment-based classifications are based on Acts of Congress and Congress has not exempted math teachers from the job offer requirement. The petitioner's witness letters showed impact only in local classrooms and school systems.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO rejected the argument that enactment of the NCLBA made math teaching inherently national in scope, noting that all employment-based classifications are based on Acts of Congress and Congress has not exempted math teachers from the job offer requirement. The petitioner's witness letters showed impact only in local classrooms and school systems.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-15_01_B5203; source_row=16393 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManagerPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner submitted salary comparisons limited to peers at the two universities where she worked, which is not an appropriate basis for comparison. The petitioner must show a high salary relative to others in the field nationally, not just compared to local peers at her employing institutions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted salary comparisons limited to peers at the two universities where she worked, which is not an appropriate basis for comparison. The petitioner must show a high salary relative to others in the field nationally, not just compared to local peers at her employing institutions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=16377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree or foreign equivalent qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
A three-year or vocational credential cannot constitute a 'foreign equivalent degree' to a U.S. baccalaureate. The beneficiary's credentials were issued by vocational/technical schools, not colleges or universities, and the credential evaluator's opinion has little probative value. A combination of lesser credentials cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent of a four-year bachelor's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
A three-year or vocational credential cannot constitute a 'foreign equivalent degree' to a U.S. baccalaureate. The beneficiary's credentials were issued by vocational/technical schools, not colleges or universities, and the credential evaluator's opinion has little probative value. A combination of lesser credentials cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent of a four-year bachelor's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_02_B5203; source_row=16382 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManagerPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner submitted numerous expert letters and citation evidence, but the letters were largely conclusory and lacked specific examples of major impact. The citation record showed minimal to moderate independent citations (no article cited more than nine times independently), and there was no documentary evidence that the petitioner's models or findings were widely implemented throughout the field.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted numerous expert letters and citation evidence, but the letters were largely conclusory and lacked specific examples of major impact. The citation record showed minimal to moderate independent citations (no article cited more than nine times independently), and there was no documentary evidence that the petitioner's models or findings were widely implemented throughout the field. Future potential impact could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_01_B2203; source_row=16374 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
required experience and specific skills as of priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
Required experience under the labor certification was supported only by a coworker affidavit for the 1999–2005 period, which does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)'s requirement of an employer letter.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Required experience under the labor certification was supported only by a coworker affidavit for the 1999–2005 period, which does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)'s requirement of an employer letter.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_01_B5203; source_row=16380 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that, because the three-year B.Tech. was sequential to and built upon the beneficiary's prior three-year Diploma in Engineering (with shared coursework per the registrar letter), the B.Tech. qualifies as the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that, because the three-year B.Tech. was sequential to and built upon the beneficiary's prior three-year Diploma in Engineering (with shared coursework per the registrar letter), the B.Tech. qualifies as the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_01_B5203; source_row=16379 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 2009 annual report submitted was for a separate corporate entity and predated the priority date; petitioner provided no qualifying tax returns, audited financial statements, or financial officer letter for itself.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2009 annual report submitted was for a separate corporate entity and predated the priority date; petitioner provided no qualifying tax returns, audited financial statements, or financial officer letter for itself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_01_B5203; source_row=16381 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Successor petitioner's ability to pay from acquisition date forward
Why the evidence was persuasive
The petitioner's net income was $17,410,000 in 2010 and $9,969,000 in 2011, both exceeding the proffered wage of $61,000 per year. The director's contrary conclusion was therefore withdrawn.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's net income was $17,410,000 in 2010 and $9,969,000 in 2011, both exceeding the proffered wage of $61,000 per year. The director's contrary conclusion was therefore withdrawn.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-14_03_B5203; source_row=16384 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c