Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21601–21610

NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherResearcher98 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO did not dispute that the petitioner's field of medical imaging research has substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's concession on this point.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not dispute that the petitioner's field of medical imaging research has substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's concession on this point.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_02_B5203; source_row=16310
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherResearcher98 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest served to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that the director applied too high a standard by importing 'major significance' language from the extraordinary ability regulations. The AAO concluded that the petitioner's citation record, journal impact factors, and the nature of his contributions (including the CT-based algorithm) established that the scientific community recognized the significance of his specific research, and that retaining his services…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the director applied too high a standard by importing 'major significance' language from the extraordinary ability regulations. The AAO concluded that the petitioner's citation record, journal impact factors, and the nature of his contributions (including the CT-based algorithm) established that the scientific community recognized the significance of his specific research, and that retaining his services outweighs the national interest in the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_02_B5203; source_row=16312
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

What the decision said

On appeal, the petitioner did not contest the director's findings for this criterion or offer additional arguments, so AAO considered the issue abandoned.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
On appeal, the petitioner did not contest the director's findings for this criterion or offer additional arguments, so AAO considered the issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_03_B2203; source_row=16315
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner had abandoned this criterion on the prior appeal and did not specifically challenge that finding on motion. Additionally, the submitted articles are not 'about' the petitioner, and Wikipedia evidence has no evidentiary weight.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner had abandoned this criterion on the prior appeal and did not specifically challenge that finding on motion. Additionally, the submitted articles are not 'about' the petitioner, and Wikipedia evidence has no evidentiary weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_02_B2203; source_row=16308
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's evidence was vague and lacked corroboration. Expert letters made general assertions without specific supporting details. Post-filing accomplishments could not retroactively establish eligibility. Peer review participation and teaching duties were found to be routine rather than exceptional.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence was vague and lacked corroboration. Expert letters made general assertions without specific supporting details. Post-filing accomplishments could not retroactively establish eligibility. Peer review participation and teaching duties were found to be routine rather than exceptional. The petitioner never substantiated claims of published research and did not pursue the statutory physician shortage area pathway.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_04_B5203; source_row=16325
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The director found the petitioner met the first prong regarding intrinsic merit, and this was not disputed on appeal.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The director found the petitioner met the first prong regarding intrinsic merit, and this was not disputed on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_04_B5203; source_row=16323
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

The director found the petitioner met the second prong regarding national scope, and this was not disputed on appeal.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The director found the petitioner met the second prong regarding national scope, and this was not disputed on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_04_B5203; source_row=16324
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found petitioner failed the third NYSDOT prong because he had no record of prior achievements as a TAA attorney; reliance on his S.J.D. degree, young age, Chinese language familiarity, ABA moot court judging, and a UN conference invitation was insufficient and largely speculative.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found petitioner failed the third NYSDOT prong because he had no record of prior achievements as a TAA attorney; reliance on his S.J.D. degree, young age, Chinese language familiarity, ABA moot court judging, and a UN conference invitation was insufficient and largely speculative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_03_B5203; source_row=16322
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO acknowledged the petitioner's assertions about TAA Program law addressed intrinsic merit, implicitly accepting it.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the petitioner's assertions about TAA Program law addressed intrinsic merit, implicitly accepting it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-07_03_B5203; source_row=16320
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that the 2011 tax return submitted on appeal, combined with the beneficiary's W-2 and wage records, demonstrated the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage of $77,064 from the priority date forward.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the 2011 tax return submitted on appeal, combined with the beneficiary's W-2 and wage records, demonstrated the petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage of $77,064 from the priority date forward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-05-06_03_B5203; source_row=16306
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment