Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21641–21650

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner meets the prizes or awards criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner meets the prizes or awards criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-30_02_B2203; source_row=16271
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments

What the decision said

AAO did not address criterion (viii), finding three other criteria sufficient.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not address criterion (viii), finding three other criteria sufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-30_02_B2203; source_row=16276
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

participation as a judge of the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner meets the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner meets the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-30_02_B2203; source_row=16274
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the record contained articles in a professional publication and national newspapers discussing the petitioner's waterskiing participation, injuries, competition results, and accomplishments, satisfying criterion (iii).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the record contained articles in a professional publication and national newspapers discussing the petitioner's waterskiing participation, injuries, competition results, and accomplishments, satisfying criterion (iii).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-30_02_B2203; source_row=16273
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

What the decision said

AAO did not address criterion (ii) in its analysis, finding three other criteria sufficient.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not address criterion (ii) in its analysis, finding three other criteria sufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-30_02_B2203; source_row=16272
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Economics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

What the decision said

The prior AAO decision found the membership criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The prior AAO decision found the membership criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=16258
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Economics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary

What the decision said

The prior AAO decision found the high salary criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The prior AAO decision found the high salary criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=16262
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Economics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

What the decision said

The prior AAO decision found the awards criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The prior AAO decision found the awards criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=16257
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Economics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

What the decision said

The prior AAO decision found the judging criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The prior AAO decision found the judging criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=16259
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Economics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

What the decision said

The prior AAO found this criterion met, but counsel did not raise it on the current motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The prior AAO found this criterion met, but counsel did not raise it on the current motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=16261
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment