Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21651–21660

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Economics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions

What the decision said

The prior AAO decision found the original contributions criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The prior AAO decision found the original contributions criterion not met, and counsel did not contest this on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B2203; source_row=16260
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO noted that national scope of the field was not disputed but that it alone does not qualify the individual petitioner for the waiver.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that national scope of the field was not disputed but that it alone does not qualify the individual petitioner for the waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=16264
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the petitioner's evidence showed extensive experience but not influence: letters from Russia were old and did not establish continued impact; the publications list lacked proof of publication or citation impact; and the petitioner's shifting focus among phosphate, gold, and hydrocarbons prevented a coherent showing of prospective national benefit.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's evidence showed extensive experience but not influence: letters from Russia were old and did not establish continued impact; the publications list lacked proof of publication or citation impact; and the petitioner's shifting focus among phosphate, gold, and hydrocarbons prevented a coherent showing of prospective national benefit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=16265
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO noted that intrinsic merit of geology was not in dispute but emphasized it relates to the occupation rather than the individual petitioner.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that intrinsic merit of geology was not in dispute but emphasized it relates to the occupation rather than the individual petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=16263
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Single foreign equivalent degree from a college or university

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that IETE associate membership, although representing a comparable level of education, is not a degree from a college or university and therefore not a foreign equivalent degree. USCIS is not bound by foreign government recognition, and the petitioner did not submit evidence from the U.S. master's program institution confirming acceptance of IETE membership as bachelor's-equivalent.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that IETE associate membership, although representing a comparable level of education, is not a degree from a college or university and therefore not a foreign equivalent degree. USCIS is not bound by foreign government recognition, and the petitioner did not submit evidence from the U.S. master's program institution confirming acceptance of IETE membership as bachelor's-equivalent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-26_02_B5203; source_row=16248
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or foreign equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO preferred the EDGE peer-reviewed information indicating the Indian three-year B.Sc. is comparable to two to three years of U.S. university study and the Indian M.Sc. is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, finding the petitioner's evaluations unsubstantiated.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO preferred the EDGE peer-reviewed information indicating the Indian three-year B.Sc. is comparable to two to three years of U.S. university study and the Indian M.Sc. is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, finding the petitioner's evaluations unsubstantiated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-26_08_B5203; source_row=16256
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification education requirement

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the plain language of the labor certification requires a single foreign equivalent bachelor's degree in computer science or engineering, which the IETE associate membership does not provide.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the plain language of the labor certification requires a single foreign equivalent bachelor's degree in computer science or engineering, which the IETE associate membership does not provide.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-26_02_B5203; source_row=16249
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

bachelor's degree in the major field listed on the ETA Form 9089

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Queens College evaluation improperly relied on an H-1B equivalency formula (experience substituting for college credit) that is not available under the immigrant visa regulations. The beneficiary's degrees are in chemical engineering and general engineering, not computer science or a related field, so neither satisfies the labor certification's educational requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Queens College evaluation improperly relied on an H-1B equivalency formula (experience substituting for college credit) that is not available under the immigrant visa regulations. The beneficiary's degrees are in chemical engineering and general engineering, not computer science or a related field, so neither satisfies the labor certification's educational requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-26_01_B5203; source_row=16247
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

bachelor's degree (or foreign equivalent) in the field specified by the labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the petitioner restricted the field of study on the ETA Form 9089 to computer information systems, and the beneficiary holds only physics-related degrees. The new credential evaluation lacks supporting documentation for its credit calculations and university-acceptance claims, and EDGE indicates the Pakistani B.S. equates only to two-to-three years of U.S. study while the M.S. equates to a U.S.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner restricted the field of study on the ETA Form 9089 to computer information systems, and the beneficiary holds only physics-related degrees. The new credential evaluation lacks supporting documentation for its credit calculations and university-acceptance claims, and EDGE indicates the Pakistani B.S. equates only to two-to-three years of U.S. study while the M.S. equates to a U.S. bachelor's — neither in the required field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-26_04_B5203; source_row=16251
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

other

five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty

Why the evidence was persuasive

The newly submitted experience letter is sufficient to support the claimed work experience, and that portion of the prior AAO decision is withdrawn.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The newly submitted experience letter is sufficient to support the claimed work experience, and that portion of the prior AAO decision is withdrawn.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-26_04_B5203; source_row=16252
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment