Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement (bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO relied on EDGE (AACRAO) peer-reviewed information showing that a three-year South African Bachelor of Arts degree is comparable to only three years of U.S. university study, not a full four-year baccalaureate. The private evaluations were not persuasive because they lacked comparative analysis, did not address the beneficiary's actual courses of study, and were not peer-reviewed.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO relied on EDGE (AACRAO) peer-reviewed information showing that a three-year South African Bachelor of Arts degree is comparable to only three years of U.S. university study, not a full four-year baccalaureate. The private evaluations were not persuasive because they lacked comparative analysis, did not address the beneficiary's actual courses of study, and were not peer-reviewed. A three-year degree cannot serve as a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-23_01_B5203; source_row=16236 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Foreign degree equivalency to U.S. bachelor's degree
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the beneficiary's degree from India is more likely than not comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree in computer science, consistent with the equivalency evaluation and AACRAO EDGE database information.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the beneficiary's degree from India is more likely than not comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree in computer science, consistent with the equivalency evaluation and AACRAO EDGE database information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-23_02_B5203; source_row=16237 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
bachelor's degree plus five years progressive experience alternative
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO's prior decision rejected this claim and the petitioner offers no new facts or legal basis to disturb that conclusion; the labor certification also expressly precluded any alternative combination of education and experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO's prior decision rejected this claim and the petitioner offers no new facts or legal basis to disturb that conclusion; the labor certification also expressly precluded any alternative combination of education and experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-23_03_B5203; source_row=16240 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Indian three-plus-two degree sequence is not a foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree, the beneficiary does not satisfy Part H's minimum education requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Indian three-plus-two degree sequence is not a foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree, the beneficiary does not satisfy Part H's minimum education requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-23_03_B5203; source_row=16241 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that criterion (vii) is limited to visual artists and does not cover performances by performing artists. Because the petitioner is a violinist (performing artist) rather than a visual artist, her performances do not constitute display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that criterion (vii) is limited to visual artists and does not cover performances by performing artists. Because the petitioner is a violinist (performing artist) rather than a visual artist, her performances do not constitute display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-19_01_B2203; source_row=16232 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy Step 1 (at least three criteria). AAO noted the evidence was insufficient but declined to formally explain that conclusion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy Step 1 (at least three criteria). AAO noted the evidence was insufficient but declined to formally explain that conclusion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-19_01_B2203; source_row=16235 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner initially submitted recordings but made no claims or documentation regarding commercial successes, and did not raise any legal or factual challenges on appeal. AAO concluded the claim was abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner initially submitted recordings but made no claims or documentation regarding commercial successes, and did not raise any legal or factual challenges on appeal. AAO concluded the claim was abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-19_01_B2203; source_row=16234 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
On appeal, the petitioner submitted letters from publication presidents and a chief editor providing circulation numbers that established the publications as professional or major trade publications. The articles featured the petitioner and her work as a violinist, satisfying all plain language requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On appeal, the petitioner submitted letters from publication presidents and a chief editor providing circulation numbers that established the publications as professional or major trade publications. The articles featured the petitioner and her work as a violinist, satisfying all plain language requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-19_01_B2203; source_row=16230 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Required statement on judicial proceedings — 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(1)(iii)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Counsel failed to submit the required statement as to whether the validity of the AAO's prior decision has been or is the subject of any judicial proceeding, rendering the motion procedurally defective.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Counsel failed to submit the required statement as to whether the validity of the AAO's prior decision has been or is the subject of any judicial proceeding, rendering the motion procedurally defective.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-18_01_B2203; source_row=16228 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c