Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21612170

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under prong one, making a determination on prong three unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under prong one, making a determination on prong three unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_02_B5203; source_row=41913
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under prong one, making a determination on prong two unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under prong one, making a determination on prong two unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_02_B5203; source_row=41912
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed and noted the Petitioner did not overcome this conclusion on motion or appeal.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed and noted the Petitioner did not overcome this conclusion on motion or appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_06_B5203; source_row=41940
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed; the Petitioner did not address this prong on appeal.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed; the Petitioner did not address this prong on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_06_B5203; source_row=41941
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

license to practice or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO disagreed with the Director's conclusion that course completion certificates satisfy this criterion, explaining that the Petitioner did not show how such certificates constitute a license to practice or certification for a profession or occupation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's conclusion that course completion certificates satisfy this criterion, explaining that the Petitioner did not show how such certificates constitute a license to practice or certification for a profession or occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_06_B5203; source_row=41938
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO noted that the Director in fact acknowledged the Petitioner satisfied the academic record criterion, contrary to the Petitioner's mischaracterization on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Director in fact acknowledged the Petitioner satisfied the academic record criterion, contrary to the Petitioner's mischaracterization on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_06_B5203; source_row=41937
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life SciencesResearcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for a distinguished organization

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the petitioner's position as Senior Research Fellow at a distinguished U.S. government neuroscience research institute, where he conducted and led research projects while supervising and mentoring fellows, demonstrated a critical role. The organization was identified as the largest supporter of world research in its field and thus highly distinguished.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's position as Senior Research Fellow at a distinguished U.S. government neuroscience research institute, where he conducted and led research projects while supervising and mentoring fellows, demonstrated a critical role. The organization was identified as the largest supporter of world research in its field and thus highly distinguished.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=41906
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life SciencesResearcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner established original contributions of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner established original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=41904
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life SciencesResearcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner established the scholarly articles criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner established the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=41905
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherEngineer

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed the importance of the broader industry rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed endeavor. Letters of support discussed past research but showed little knowledge of the proposed future endeavor, and the Petitioner did not establish how his future work would have national or global implications or significant economic effects beyond his employer and its cli…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed the importance of the broader industry rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed endeavor. Letters of support discussed past research but showed little knowledge of the proposed future endeavor, and the Petitioner did not establish how his future work would have national or global implications or significant economic effects beyond his employer and its clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-20_03_B5203; source_row=41886
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment