Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 21731–21740
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
What the decision said
Counsel raised no argument regarding the high salary criterion on appeal; the AAO considers this issue abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Counsel raised no argument regarding the high salary criterion on appeal; the AAO considers this issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-04_01_B2203; source_row=16170 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO rejected the director's reasoning about citation evidence, finding the petitioner's 100+ citations and witness letters credibly demonstrated impact of his student-era work. Nevertheless, AAO concluded the petitioner had not established prospective national benefit because he had ceased publishing after leaving graduate school and the record was virtually silent regarding the influence of his post-student work at mul…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO rejected the director's reasoning about citation evidence, finding the petitioner's 100+ citations and witness letters credibly demonstrated impact of his student-era work. Nevertheless, AAO concluded the petitioner had not established prospective national benefit because he had ceased publishing after leaving graduate school and the record was virtually silent regarding the influence of his post-student work at multiple subsequent employers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-03_01_B5203; source_row=16161 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The contributions either impacted a specific institution, local community or region, or specific conventions, without sufficient detail to establish major significance in the field. The petitioner's letters primarily contain bare assertions and vague claims without specific examples of major significance, and the importance of a research area alone does not establish the actual impact of the research.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The contributions either impacted a specific institution, local community or region, or specific conventions, without sufficient detail to establish major significance in the field. The petitioner's letters primarily contain bare assertions and vague claims without specific examples of major significance, and the importance of a research area alone does not establish the actual impact of the research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16154 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The awards are either age-restricted or limited to physicians still in training programs such as internship, residency, or fellowship, effectively excluding established professionals. The record also lacks evidence that any award is nationally or internationally recognized in the field, and counsel's assertions do not constitute evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The awards are either age-restricted or limited to physicians still in training programs such as internship, residency, or fellowship, effectively excluding established professionals. The record also lacks evidence that any award is nationally or internationally recognized in the field, and counsel's assertions do not constitute evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16150 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner must demonstrate significantly higher pay compared to other physicians who also held the Medical Director role, not merely that she received dual compensation. The salary document is also in Spanish without a certified translation, failing the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner must demonstrate significantly higher pay compared to other physicians who also held the Medical Director role, not merely that she received dual compensation. The salary document is also in Spanish without a certified translation, failing the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16157 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c