Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21741–21750

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The bylaws for the associate membership require only education, residence, absence of sanctions, recommendations, and payment of dues — not outstanding achievements. The record contains no evidence that outstanding achievements are required for Principal, Honorary, or Active membership in the other organizations. Additionally, two letters were in Spanish without certified translations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The bylaws for the associate membership require only education, residence, absence of sanctions, recommendations, and payment of dues — not outstanding achievements. The record contains no evidence that outstanding achievements are required for Principal, Honorary, or Active membership in the other organizations. Additionally, two letters were in Spanish without certified translations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16151
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

A petitioner's own work product (such as authored guidelines) is not published material about the alien. After reviewing the translation, the AAO confirmed the contents are not about the petitioner, and there is no evidence the document appeared in a professional or major trade publication or other major media.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
A petitioner's own work product (such as authored guidelines) is not published material about the alien. After reviewing the translation, the AAO confirmed the contents are not about the petitioner, and there is no evidence the document appeared in a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16152
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters do not show how the Medical Director fits within the overall organizational hierarchy or explain how the petitioner impacted the organization. The certification document merely states titles with no information about the petitioner's role. The petitioner also failed to establish that the organizations have a distinguished reputation, and the appeal evidence lacked certified translations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The letters do not show how the Medical Director fits within the overall organizational hierarchy or explain how the petitioner impacted the organization. The certification document merely states titles with no information about the petitioner's role. The petitioner also failed to establish that the organizations have a distinguished reputation, and the appeal evidence lacked certified translations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16156
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters of support from attorneys and clients who used the petitioner's services describe his skill and expertise in time and motion studies and wage-and-hour litigation, but none provide specific examples of how his original work has significantly impacted the field of industrial engineering.…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The letters of support from attorneys and clients who used the petitioner's services describe his skill and expertise in time and motion studies and wage-and-hour litigation, but none provide specific examples of how his original work has significantly impacted the field of industrial engineering. Merely possessing unique skills or alleviating a skill shortage does not constitute original contributions of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=16143
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

What the decision said

AAO did not separately address the second NYSDOT factor; the decision focused its substantive analysis on the third factor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately address the second NYSDOT factor; the decision focused its substantive analysis on the third factor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_01_B5203; source_row=16148
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not dispute that the petitioner's research area—HIV, cardiovascular disease, and infectious disease—has substantial intrinsic merit. The focus of the denial was on the third NYSDOT factor.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not dispute that the petitioner's research area—HIV, cardiovascular disease, and infectious disease—has substantial intrinsic merit. The focus of the denial was on the third NYSDOT factor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_01_B5203; source_row=16147
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The witness letters described the projects' importance rather than the petitioner's distinctive individual impact on the field as a whole. Citation evidence was minimal (seven total citations, potentially including self-citations). The petitioner's MBA studies suggested a future administrative career rather than front-line research.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The witness letters described the projects' importance rather than the petitioner's distinctive individual impact on the field as a whole. Citation evidence was minimal (seven total citations, potentially including self-citations). The petitioner's MBA studies suggested a future administrative career rather than front-line research. Witnesses gave conflicting accounts of whether the petitioner's prior India work was national or local in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_01_B5203; source_row=16149
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO withdrew the director's determination, finding that the description of the petitioner's duties — which includes arbitrating and making appraisals of professionals and medical facilities — establishes participation as a judge of the work of others, even though the bylaws lacked a certified translation.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's determination, finding that the description of the petitioner's duties — which includes arbitrating and making appraisals of professionals and medical facilities — establishes participation as a judge of the work of others, even though the bylaws lacked a certified translation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16153
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO affirmed the director's determination that the petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The AAO affirmed the director's determination that the petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_02_B2203; source_row=16155
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner's evidence meets this regulatory criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner's evidence meets this regulatory criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=16142
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment