Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21811–21820

NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO acknowledged that education has intrinsic merit generally but found that the petitioner's evidence was insufficient to set her apart from other competent teachers or to show the broader impact required under NYSDOT.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO acknowledged that education has intrinsic merit generally but found that the petitioner's evidence was insufficient to set her apart from other competent teachers or to show the broader impact required under NYSDOT.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_04_B5203; source_row=16056
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that counsel conflated the national importance of education as a concept with the impact of one teacher, and that the petitioner's work was entirely local. The AAO rejected the argument that the No Child Left Behind Act displaces NYSDOT or creates a blanket waiver for teachers.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that counsel conflated the national importance of education as a concept with the impact of one teacher, and that the petitioner's work was entirely local. The AAO rejected the argument that the No Child Left Behind Act displaces NYSDOT or creates a blanket waiver for teachers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_04_B5203; source_row=16057
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO did not contest that teaching mathematics has substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's acknowledgment.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not contest that teaching mathematics has substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's acknowledgment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_03_B5203; source_row=16053
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence demonstrated she is a successful teacher but did not set her apart from other competent teachers. The evidence did not show her work produced results significantly greater than comparable U.S. workers, and the debarment of her employer could not substitute for demonstrating individual qualifications. Her stated near-retirement further limited projections of future national benefit.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence demonstrated she is a successful teacher but did not set her apart from other competent teachers. The evidence did not show her work produced results significantly greater than comparable U.S. workers, and the debarment of her employer could not substitute for demonstrating individual qualifications. Her stated near-retirement further limited projections of future national benefit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_03_B5203; source_row=16055
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that general assertions about the importance of education do not establish national scope, and the evidence showed only local-level improvement in the petitioner's classroom or school district. The petitioner's school district continued to rank near the bottom after six years of her work, and she had not demonstrated impact beyond a handful of local schools.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that general assertions about the importance of education do not establish national scope, and the evidence showed only local-level improvement in the petitioner's classroom or school district. The petitioner's school district continued to rank near the bottom after six years of her work, and she had not demonstrated impact beyond a handful of local schools.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_03_B5203; source_row=16054
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

What the decision said

AAO did not separately address the first NYSDOT prong; the decision focuses its analysis on national scope and the third prong (serving the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker).

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately address the first NYSDOT prong; the decision focuses its analysis on national scope and the third prong (serving the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_07_B5203; source_row=16065
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that closing the achievement gap is a national goal, but that does not mean the petitioner's individual efforts are national in scope. Her district's continued low ranking after five years of her work suggests her efforts have not resulted in measurable overall improvements even at the local level.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that closing the achievement gap is a national goal, but that does not mean the petitioner's individual efforts are national in scope. Her district's continued low ranking after five years of her work suggests her efforts have not resulted in measurable overall improvements even at the local level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_07_B5203; source_row=16066
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that counsel conflated the national importance of 'education' as a concept with the impact of one teacher, and that the undeniable importance of education as a whole does not imply Congress has indirectly exempted individual teachers from the job offer requirement.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that counsel conflated the national importance of 'education' as a concept with the impact of one teacher, and that the undeniable importance of education as a whole does not imply Congress has indirectly exempted individual teachers from the job offer requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_10_B5203; source_row=16073
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

What the decision said

The AAO did not separately address whether the petitioner's work has substantial intrinsic merit, as the decision focused on the national scope and comparative benefit prongs.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately address whether the petitioner's work has substantial intrinsic merit, as the decision focused on the national scope and comparative benefit prongs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_10_B5203; source_row=16072
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

What the decision said

The AAO did not separately address the first NYSDOT prong (substantial intrinsic merit), focusing its analysis instead on national scope and the third prong.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately address the first NYSDOT prong (substantial intrinsic merit), focusing its analysis instead on national scope and the third prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=16050
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment