Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 21821–21830
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's website lacked evidence of widespread use; his publications were internal school journals of very limited circulation; and his impact was confined to the local schools and districts where he personally worked, not demonstrating national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's website lacked evidence of widespread use; his publications were internal school journals of very limited circulation; and his impact was confined to the local schools and districts where he personally worked, not demonstrating national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=16051 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO acknowledged that publications and presentations provide benefits national in scope, but emphasized this only matters if the petitioner continues to perform research.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged that publications and presentations provide benefits national in scope, but emphasized this only matters if the petitioner continues to perform research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_08_B5203; source_row=16069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than a qualified U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the citation record thin (largely tied to one literature-review article), found the witness letters generalized and partially boilerplate, found that the Merci device usage claim was undermined by prior published reports by others, and concluded that learning advanced procedures and teaching them to peers does not equate to innovation.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the citation record thin (largely tied to one literature-review article), found the witness letters generalized and partially boilerplate, found that the Merci device usage claim was undermined by prior published reports by others, and concluded that learning advanced procedures and teaching them to peers does not equate to innovation. AAO also found the petitioner's status as a junior resident inconsistent with claims of being among the nation's top specialists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_08_B5203; source_row=16070 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although the petitioner's 2007 net income of $116,299 nominally exceeded the proffered wage, when the aggregate salary shortfall of approximately $188,094 for 9 other simultaneously pending petitions is considered, the net income is insufficient to cover all obligations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the petitioner's 2007 net income of $116,299 nominally exceeded the proffered wage, when the aggregate salary shortfall of approximately $188,094 for 9 other simultaneously pending petitions is considered, the net income is insufficient to cover all obligations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16060 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via wages actually paid to beneficiary
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner paid the beneficiary only $67,295.50 in 2007, which was $2,704.50 less than the $70,000 proffered wage. Full payment was established only for 2008–2011.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner paid the beneficiary only $67,295.50 in 2007, which was $2,704.50 less than the $70,000 proffered wage. Full payment was established only for 2008–2011.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's 2007 net current assets of $102,112 nominally exceeded the individual proffered wage shortfall, but the combined shortfall of $188,094 for all simultaneously pending petitions exceeded net current assets as well.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2007 net current assets of $102,112 nominally exceeded the individual proffered wage shortfall, but the combined shortfall of $188,094 for all simultaneously pending petitions exceeded net current assets as well.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16061 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Matter of Sonegawa)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO considered broader business factors under Sonegawa but found no evidence of significant growth, outstanding business reputation, or uncharacteristic expenditures. The presence of dozens of simultaneous immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions further undermined the petitioner's financial credibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO considered broader business factors under Sonegawa but found no evidence of significant growth, outstanding business reputation, or uncharacteristic expenditures. The presence of dozens of simultaneous immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions further undermined the petitioner's financial credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16062 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The labor certification required a bachelor's degree in civil engineering, 60 months of experience as a structural engineer, and a Connecticut professional engineering license. The record contained multiple inconsistent employment dates across Forms 9089 (signed under penalty of perjury), Form G-325A, and employer letters, and the beneficiary failed to resolve these with independent objective evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The labor certification required a bachelor's degree in civil engineering, 60 months of experience as a structural engineer, and a Connecticut professional engineering license. The record contained multiple inconsistent employment dates across Forms 9089 (signed under penalty of perjury), Form G-325A, and employer letters, and the beneficiary failed to resolve these with independent objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_06_B5203; source_row=16064 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Under the correct substantial and probative evidence standard from Matter of Tawfik, the record supports a finding of marriage fraud. The petitioning spouse twice withdrew I-130 petitions with written statements that the beneficiary married her to remain in the U.S. legally, and the record contains numerous unresolved inconsistencies in the parties' statements about cohabitation.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Under the correct substantial and probative evidence standard from Matter of Tawfik, the record supports a finding of marriage fraud. The petitioning spouse twice withdrew I-130 petitions with written statements that the beneficiary married her to remain in the U.S. legally, and the record contains numerous unresolved inconsistencies in the parties' statements about cohabitation. The beneficiary failed to reconcile these inconsistencies with independent objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_06_B5203; source_row=16063 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c