Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 21921–21930

NIWlicense or certificationNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license or certification

What the decision said

AAO did not separately address criterion (C); it was not at issue on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately address criterion (C); it was not at issue on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_02_B5203; source_row=15947
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · MembershipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in professional associations

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the director incorrectly applied the extraordinary ability classification standard to an exceptional ability case; the exceptional ability criterion only requires evidence of membership in professional associations without any requirement that the association demand outstanding achievements or expert-judged membership.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the director incorrectly applied the extraordinary ability classification standard to an exceptional ability case; the exceptional ability criterion only requires evidence of membership in professional associations without any requirement that the association demand outstanding achievements or expert-judged membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_02_B5203; source_row=15949
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed the director's finding that criterion (B) was satisfied.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that criterion (B) was satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_02_B5203; source_row=15946
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Labor certification job offer requires alien of exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed that 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4) expressly requires the job offer portion of an individual labor certification to demonstrate that the position requires an alien of exceptional ability. The labor certification on file only required a bachelor's or master's degree and did not include exceptional ability requirements.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4) expressly requires the job offer portion of an individual labor certification to demonstrate that the position requires an alien of exceptional ability. The labor certification on file only required a bachelor's or master's degree and did not include exceptional ability requirements. The petitioner also abandoned the challenge to the director's factual finding by failing to contest it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_01_B5203; source_row=15939
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services

What the decision said

The petitioner did not claim eligibility for this criterion before the director either in the initial petition or in response to the RFE. New eligibility claims not raised before the director are not considered on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not claim eligibility for this criterion before the director either in the initial petition or in response to the RFE. New eligibility claims not raised before the director are not considered on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_04_B2203; source_row=15964
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

What the decision said

Because the director did not address this criterion and the petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error relating to it on appeal, the AAO concluded the petitioner abandoned this claim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because the director did not address this criterion and the petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error relating to it on appeal, the AAO concluded the petitioner abandoned this claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_04_B2203; source_row=15960
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhysician

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

What the decision said

Although counsel pointed to material the petitioner authored or co-authored, counsel did not specifically challenge the director's adverse finding, so the petitioner abandoned this issue.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Although counsel pointed to material the petitioner authored or co-authored, counsel did not specifically challenge the director's adverse finding, so the petitioner abandoned this issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=15934
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhysician

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

participation as a judge of the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record contained evidence that the petitioner was the publisher/editor of art magazines and an art critic who authored and published art-related material, meeting this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The record contained evidence that the petitioner was the publisher/editor of art magazines and an art critic who authored and published art-related material, meeting this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=15932
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

Upon review of all the evidence, including the new letter submitted on appeal clarifying the jury process and petitioner's role, AAO found the petitioner satisfied the plain language requirements for this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Upon review of all the evidence, including the new letter submitted on appeal clarifying the jury process and petitioner's role, AAO found the petitioner satisfied the plain language requirements for this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=15941
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met the criterion for display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met the criterion for display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=15943
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment