Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
job offer requires an alien of exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4))
Why the evidence was persuasive
Based on the Form ETA 750 and the listed $500,000 salary, the AAO found the offered position in the aggregate requires an alien of exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Based on the Form ETA 750 and the listed $500,000 salary, the AAO found the offered position in the aggregate requires an alien of exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-26_01_B5203; source_row=15927 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesResearch Scientist
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters attesting to the petitioner's critical role at the laboratory level are conclusory regarding the larger organization. A role in one laboratory does not translate to a critical role for the larger institution. The research institute where the petitioner works is itself just one of 27 institutes comprising NIH and cannot be counted as a separate organization.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Letters attesting to the petitioner's critical role at the laboratory level are conclusory regarding the larger organization. A role in one laboratory does not translate to a critical role for the larger institution. The research institute where the petitioner works is itself just one of 27 institutes comprising NIH and cannot be counted as a separate organization. The regulation requires a leading or critical role for 'organizations' in the plural, and the petitioner demonstrated at most a role for one organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=15915 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that APS membership based on a review of an applicant's bibliography for meritorious research does not require outstanding achievement, and the membership committee is not required to consist of recognized national or international experts.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that APS membership based on a review of an applicant's bibliography for meritorious research does not require outstanding achievement, and the membership committee is not required to consist of recognized national or international experts. For AAI, the membership requirements are minimal (one publication in a peer-reviewed journal plus a degree), and the bylaws focus on geographic and cultural diversity rather than expert evaluation, so AAI membership does not reflect outstanding achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=15911 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesResearch Scientist
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The citation record does not show any single article with frequent citations. Supervisor letters are complimentary but do not identify specific contributions of major significance. Independent letters repeat statutory language and focus on publications and awards rather than demonstrating major significance. Only two laboratories are definitively shown using the petitioner's novel technique, insufficient for widespread impact.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The citation record does not show any single article with frequent citations. Supervisor letters are complimentary but do not identify specific contributions of major significance. Independent letters repeat statutory language and focus on publications and awards rather than demonstrating major significance. Only two laboratories are definitively shown using the petitioner's novel technique, insufficient for widespread impact. Even accepting the novel technique as an original contribution, the regulation requires plural 'contributions' and the petitioner demonstrated only a singular contribution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-25_01_B2203; source_row=15913 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary qualifications per labor certification
What the decision said
AAO remanded for the Director to determine whether the beneficiary's credentials qualify her for the proffered audiologist position under the labor certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO remanded for the Director to determine whether the beneficiary's credentials qualify her for the proffered audiologist position under the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-25_01_B5203; source_row=15920 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO credited the FY 2009 annual-report net income of $1,514,000 and the 2010 wage payments above the proffered wage as sufficient to establish continuing ability to pay from the October 20, 2009 priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO credited the FY 2009 annual-report net income of $1,514,000 and the 2010 wage payments above the proffered wage as sufficient to establish continuing ability to pay from the October 20, 2009 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-25_01_B5203; source_row=15918 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c