Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 21991–22000
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsPhD15 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO noted the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's work is not in dispute, accepting that her research in applied mathematics, jet acoustics, and composite materials has substantial intrinsic merit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's work is not in dispute, accepting that her research in applied mathematics, jet acoustics, and composite materials has substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_07_B5203; source_row=15876 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / StatisticsPhD15 citations
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO implicitly accepted national scope of the petitioner's work, as the analysis focused on the third prong as the dispositive failing rather than raising concerns about scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO implicitly accepted national scope of the petitioner's work, as the analysis focused on the third prong as the dispositive failing rather than raising concerns about scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_07_B5203; source_row=15877 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical114 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the threshold requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the threshold requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_02_B2203; source_row=15868 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
What the decision said
The petitioner did not raise this criterion before the director despite multiple opportunities, so the AAO declined to consider it on appeal under Matter of Soriano.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not raise this criterion before the director despite multiple opportunities, so the AAO declined to consider it on appeal under Matter of Soriano.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_01_B2203; source_row=15853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
What the decision said
The petitioner did not raise this criterion before the director despite multiple opportunities; a previously unclaimed eligibility criterion may not be raised for the first time on appeal under Matter of Soriano.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not raise this criterion before the director despite multiple opportunities; a previously unclaimed eligibility criterion may not be raised for the first time on appeal under Matter of Soriano.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_01_B2203; source_row=15855 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
What the decision said
This criterion was raised for the first time on appeal; under Matter of Soriano, a previously unclaimed eligibility criterion may not be raised on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
This criterion was raised for the first time on appeal; under Matter of Soriano, a previously unclaimed eligibility criterion may not be raised on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_01_B2203; source_row=15857 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the record establishes a wide array of researchers relying on the petitioner's work, significant attention from the automobile industry and NHTSA, and that several citing articles emphasized the petitioner's work rather than merely citing it in passing. AAO also noted the director gave an incorrect impression of the witness letters and that the petitioner's narrow field has inherently low citation rates.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record establishes a wide array of researchers relying on the petitioner's work, significant attention from the automobile industry and NHTSA, and that several citing articles emphasized the petitioner's work rather than merely citing it in passing. AAO also noted the director gave an incorrect impression of the witness letters and that the petitioner's narrow field has inherently low citation rates. The documented facts underlying the claims sufficiently established the third prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-19_02_B5203; source_row=15871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c