Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence — primarily above-average citations, two satisfied criteria, and reference letters speculating about future impact — did not demonstrate he is within the small percentage at the very top of his field. His level of achievement was found to fall far short of the highest level in neurobiology.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence — primarily above-average citations, two satisfied criteria, and reference letters speculating about future impact — did not demonstrate he is within the small percentage at the very top of his field. His level of achievement was found to fall far short of the highest level in neurobiology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-13_03_B2203; source_row=15848 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that accreditation by a regional body recognized by the DoEd and CHEA is implicitly required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), because the regulation's repeated use of 'United States' degree signals that such degrees must be recognized and honored on a nationwide basis.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that accreditation by a regional body recognized by the DoEd and CHEA is implicitly required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), because the regulation's repeated use of 'United States' degree signals that such degrees must be recognized and honored on a nationwide basis. The beneficiary's university lost its accreditation before he completed his degree and does not appear on SACS/COC lists, so the MBA cannot be deemed to have nationwide recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-12_05_B5203; source_row=15833 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the beneficiary's MBA is from an unaccredited institution and thus does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree, and he has no foreign equivalent degree, he does not meet the master's degree requirement stated in the labor certification. No alternate combination of education and experience is permitted under the labor certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the beneficiary's MBA is from an unaccredited institution and thus does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree, and he has no foreign equivalent degree, he does not meet the master's degree requirement stated in the labor certification. No alternate combination of education and experience is permitted under the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-12_05_B5203; source_row=15834 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets minimum education/experience requirements on labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the beneficiary's foreign education was equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree and that the labor certification's explicit master's degree requirement could not be satisfied by combining a bachelor's degree with experience under Matter of Silver Dragon.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the beneficiary's foreign education was equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree and that the labor certification's explicit master's degree requirement could not be satisfied by combining a bachelor's degree with experience under Matter of Silver Dragon.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-12_04_B5203; source_row=15832 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's finding because while the petitioner demonstrated a leading role, he failed to establish that the organizations have a distinguished reputation. One local award and one local bulletin article were insufficient, and the petitioner did not document the reputation of the other organizations. AAO also noted the regulation requires evidence of a leading/critical role for organizations in the plural.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because while the petitioner demonstrated a leading role, he failed to establish that the organizations have a distinguished reputation. One local award and one local bulletin article were insufficient, and the petitioner did not document the reputation of the other organizations. AAO also noted the regulation requires evidence of a leading/critical role for organizations in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=15830 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding, concluding that two half-page poster presentation abstracts lacking footnotes, bibliography, or illustrations are not scholarly articles, and that an unpublished dissertation and presentation slides do not constitute articles in professional or major trade publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding, concluding that two half-page poster presentation abstracts lacking footnotes, bibliography, or illustrations are not scholarly articles, and that an unpublished dissertation and presentation slides do not constitute articles in professional or major trade publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=15829 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
The totality of evidence shows only local/regional recognition. Support letters mostly come from current or former colleagues, new independent letters were solicited based solely on CV review, contributions are tied to employment and lack demonstrated field-wide impact, judging was internal and supervisory in nature, and awards are local or mere nominations.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The totality of evidence shows only local/regional recognition. Support letters mostly come from current or former colleagues, new independent letters were solicited based solely on CV review, contributions are tied to employment and lack demonstrated field-wide impact, judging was internal and supervisory in nature, and awards are local or mere nominations. The petitioner failed to show recognition beyond the local metropolitan area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=15831 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c