Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22021–22030
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
Petitioner failed to raise a specific legal or factual challenge on the Notice of Appeal or in the appeal brief regarding this criterion, so AAO deemed the claim abandoned. AAO also affirmed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the impact of his work beyond the institutions where he has been employed.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner failed to raise a specific legal or factual challenge on the Notice of Appeal or in the appeal brief regarding this criterion, so AAO deemed the claim abandoned. AAO also affirmed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the impact of his work beyond the institutions where he has been employed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=15828 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
What the decision said
Petitioner failed to raise a challenge on appeal, so AAO concluded the claim was abandoned. AAO also affirmed because the petitioner did not submit official membership requirements for the associations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner failed to raise a challenge on appeal, so AAO concluded the claim was abandoned. AAO also affirmed because the petitioner did not submit official membership requirements for the associations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=15826 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error in the director's conclusion on appeal, so AAO deemed the claim abandoned. AAO also affirmed the director's conclusion because the awards are either local or are actually only nominations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error in the director's conclusion on appeal, so AAO deemed the claim abandoned. AAO also affirmed the director's conclusion because the awards are either local or are actually only nominations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-11_01_B2203; source_row=15825 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to demonstrate he performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments as a whole, and did not address the director's primary reason for denial on appeal, effectively abandoning the claim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to demonstrate he performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments as a whole, and did not address the director's primary reason for denial on appeal, effectively abandoning the claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15823 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the regulation requires authorship of scholarly articles in the plural, and the record contains only a single published article.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the regulation requires authorship of scholarly articles in the plural, and the record contains only a single published article.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15821 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's claimed memberships were on technical committees, not associations. Moreover, the evidence failed to show that the entities required outstanding achievements of all prospective members as judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's claimed memberships were on technical committees, not associations. Moreover, the evidence failed to show that the entities required outstanding achievements of all prospective members as judged by nationally or internationally recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15817 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO disagreed with the director's basis (individual vs. group recipient) but still found the criterion not met because the petitioner failed to establish that the prizes or awards were nationally or internationally recognized, due to unresolved inconsistencies in circulation data submitted via self-serving letters from publications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the director's basis (individual vs. group recipient) but still found the criterion not met because the petitioner failed to establish that the prizes or awards were nationally or internationally recognized, due to unresolved inconsistencies in circulation data submitted via self-serving letters from publications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15816 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letters failed to identify specifically how the petitioner's work impacted the field at large; commercial contracts showed practical value but not major significance in the field; and designing mechanical devices is a basic job duty rather than a contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letters failed to identify specifically how the petitioner's work impacted the field at large; commercial contracts showed practical value but not major significance in the field; and designing mechanical devices is a basic job duty rather than a contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15820 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the petitioner relied on self-serving, inconsistent circulation letters insufficient to establish the publications as major media, failed to provide comparative circulation data, did not establish national rather than regional reach, and the translations were incomplete excerpts that lacked required author information.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding because the petitioner relied on self-serving, inconsistent circulation letters insufficient to establish the publications as major media, failed to provide comparative circulation data, did not establish national rather than regional reach, and the translations were incomplete excerpts that lacked required author information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15818 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized award
What the decision said
The petitioner previously claimed this basis before the director but did not contest the director's adverse finding or offer additional arguments on appeal, so the AAO considers it abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner previously claimed this basis before the director but did not contest the director's adverse finding or offer additional arguments on appeal, so the AAO considers it abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15815 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c