Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the petitioner judged students not in the field, finding instead that the record contains sufficient evidence the petitioner judged the work of others specializing in robotics, his field of expertise.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the petitioner judged students not in the field, finding instead that the record contains sufficient evidence the petitioner judged the work of others specializing in robotics, his field of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=15819 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the FLC data (based on average/median wages) does not establish what constitutes a high salary and thus comparing only base salary to it was not error; the Pay Governance report relies on median compensation data, which likewise does not demonstrate commanding a high salary in relation to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the FLC data (based on average/median wages) does not establish what constitutes a high salary and thus comparing only base salary to it was not error; the Pay Governance report relies on median compensation data, which likewise does not demonstrate commanding a high salary in relation to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=15811 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's valuation model benefited his employer and its partners but was not shown to have had wide impact or wide adoption in the field; letters praising talent and ability without specific examples of field-wide impact do not satisfy the requirement of contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's valuation model benefited his employer and its partners but was not shown to have had wide impact or wide adoption in the field; letters praising talent and ability without specific examples of field-wide impact do not satisfy the requirement of contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=15808 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Regardless of whether the articles are scholarly, they are not in the beneficiary's field of claimed expertise (mortgage backed securities); the submitted articles relate to architectural design rather than the beneficiary's field.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
Regardless of whether the articles are scholarly, they are not in the beneficiary's field of claimed expertise (mortgage backed securities); the submitted articles relate to architectural design rather than the beneficiary's field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=15809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found, after reviewing all record evidence including materials submitted on appeal and in response to its NOID, that the petitioner had demonstrated the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found, after reviewing all record evidence including materials submitted on appeal and in response to its NOID, that the petitioner had demonstrated the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=15814 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO concluded that, based on the record including payroll records showing actual payment of the $150,000 proffered wage from the priority date, the petitioner demonstrated ability to pay on a continuing basis, satisfying the prima facie standard.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO concluded that, based on the record including payroll records showing actual payment of the $150,000 proffered wage from the priority date, the petitioner demonstrated ability to pay on a continuing basis, satisfying the prima facie standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-06_02_B5203; source_row=15813 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the beneficiary's Indian education is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, found both credential evaluations deficient and outweighed by EDGE, and held that the bachelor-plus-experience alternative also failed because the record did not establish five years of progressive experience by the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the beneficiary's Indian education is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, found both credential evaluations deficient and outweighed by EDGE, and held that the bachelor-plus-experience alternative also failed because the record did not establish five years of progressive experience by the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-05_03_B5203; source_row=15805 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Single foreign degree equivalent to U.S. baccalaureate
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that a three-year B.Com. is not a foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, and combining it with ICAI membership does not produce a single foreign equivalent degree as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that a three-year B.Com. is not a foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, and combining it with ICAI membership does not produce a single foreign equivalent degree as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=15804 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the beneficiary fails the labor certification's minimum educational requirement because his Indian master's degree is not equivalent to a U.S. master's degree and the labor certification does not permit an alternate combination of education and experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the beneficiary fails the labor certification's minimum educational requirement because his Indian master's degree is not equivalent to a U.S. master's degree and the labor certification does not permit an alternate combination of education and experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-05_03_B5203; source_row=15806 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c