Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Five years of progressive experience in the specialty by priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
The work experience letters document only approximately four years of experience following the award of the beneficiary's Indian bachelor's degree, falling short of the required five years by the April 5, 2010 priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The work experience letters document only approximately four years of experience following the award of the beneficiary's Indian bachelor's degree, falling short of the required five years by the April 5, 2010 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_15_B5203; source_row=15743 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Foreign equivalent degree (baccalaureate or above)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO gave greater weight to EDGE/AACRAO peer-reviewed information over the submitted evaluations, concluding that the Indian M.S. is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluations were not peer-reviewed, did not address actual courses of study, and failed to substantiate the rationale behind credit assignments.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO gave greater weight to EDGE/AACRAO peer-reviewed information over the submitted evaluations, concluding that the Indian M.S. is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluations were not peer-reviewed, did not address actual courses of study, and failed to substantiate the rationale behind credit assignments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_15_B5203; source_row=15742 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Whether the proffered position involves prohibited physician duties
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed that the job duties in the labor certification describe tasks normally performed by a physician, that counsel's job clarification constituted an impermissible material change, and that the re-categorization of the position from biochemist to medical scientist was a further impermissible material change. The beneficiary does not qualify for admission as a practicing physician.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the job duties in the labor certification describe tasks normally performed by a physician, that counsel's job clarification constituted an impermissible material change, and that the re-categorization of the position from biochemist to medical scientist was a further impermissible material change. The beneficiary does not qualify for admission as a practicing physician.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_03_B5203; source_row=15728 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date forward
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's W-2 wages fell short of the proffered wage every year. The petitioner's net income and net current assets were also insufficient to cover the deficiency in 2010, no 2011 tax return was filed, and no totality-of-circumstances factors paralleling Sonegawa were shown.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's W-2 wages fell short of the proffered wage every year. The petitioner's net income and net current assets were also insufficient to cover the deficiency in 2010, no 2011 tax return was filed, and no totality-of-circumstances factors paralleling Sonegawa were shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_17_B5203; source_row=15745 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
What the decision said
The AAO did not separately address this prong; the decision focused its analysis on whether the petitioner had shown a substantial impact greater than an available U.S. worker.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately address this prong; the decision focused its analysis on whether the petitioner had shown a substantial impact greater than an available U.S. worker.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_08_B5203; source_row=15735 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
What the decision said
The AAO did not separately address national scope as a distinct prong; the decision noted the record did not show the petitioner's work attracted any notice outside of Baltimore.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately address national scope as a distinct prong; the decision noted the record did not show the petitioner's work attracted any notice outside of Baltimore.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_08_B5203; source_row=15736 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO determined that because the beneficiary's degree is from an unaccredited institution and therefore does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree, and because he has no foreign equivalent master's degree, he does not meet the educational requirement on the labor certification for the proffered position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO determined that because the beneficiary's degree is from an unaccredited institution and therefore does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree, and because he has no foreign equivalent master's degree, he does not meet the educational requirement on the labor certification for the proffered position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_18_B5203; source_row=15747 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner submitted only two pay stubs with dates in mid-2011 and no corporate tax return for 2011. It failed to establish Sonegawa-type factors that would permit a finding of ability to pay despite shortfalls in net income or net current assets, and thus could not demonstrate ability to pay the $104,458 proffered wage from the March 29, 2011 priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted only two pay stubs with dates in mid-2011 and no corporate tax return for 2011. It failed to establish Sonegawa-type factors that would permit a finding of ability to pay despite shortfalls in net income or net current assets, and thus could not demonstrate ability to pay the $104,458 proffered wage from the March 29, 2011 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_04_B5203; source_row=15730 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employment statements are internally contradictory and conflict with the beneficiary's own declarations on the labor certification, changing job duties, titles, and employment periods from one statement to the next.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employment statements are internally contradictory and conflict with the beneficiary's own declarations on the labor certification, changing job duties, titles, and employment periods from one statement to the next. The affidavits constitute secondary evidence that fails to overcome the unavailability of primary documentation, and the description of work experience is repetitive and fails to establish the required progressive experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_04_B5203; source_row=15729 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c