Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22121–22130

NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementPhysician

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation

Why the evidence was persuasive

Employer letters affirmed the claimed periods of employment as President/CEO and in related roles. The director found the experience requirement satisfied and AAO did not disturb this finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Employer letters affirmed the claimed periods of employment as President/CEO and in related roles. The director found the experience requirement satisfied and AAO did not disturb this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=15698
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementPhysician

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why AAO was not persuaded

General assertions about the value of entrepreneurship address intrinsic merit but do not distinguish the petitioner from other entrepreneurs. The petitioner's early performance was unremarkable and future projections were speculative.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
General assertions about the value of entrepreneurship address intrinsic merit but do not distinguish the petitioner from other entrepreneurs. The petitioner's early performance was unremarkable and future projections were speculative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=15701
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementPhysician

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

academic record (degree/diploma/certificate relating to area of exceptional ability)

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner submitted documentation of a two-year degree and technical training certificate, which the director found satisfied the plain wording of the regulation. AAO did not disturb this finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted documentation of a two-year degree and technical training certificate, which the director found satisfied the plain wording of the regulation. AAO did not disturb this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_01_B5203; source_row=15697
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

valid successor-in-interest transaction under Matter of Dial Auto

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO accepted that a successor-in-interest transaction had occurred, but emphasized the successor still had to prove ability to pay from the priority date forward, which it did not.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO accepted that a successor-in-interest transaction had occurred, but emphasized the successor still had to prove ability to pay from the priority date forward, which it did not.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_06_B5203; source_row=15712
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

Wages paid were below the proffered wage, net income was a substantial loss, and personal assets and future earnings cannot substitute. Inconsistencies and lack of evidence of industry reputation defeat any Sonegawa-style totality argument.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Wages paid were below the proffered wage, net income was a substantial loss, and personal assets and future earnings cannot substitute. Inconsistencies and lack of evidence of industry reputation defeat any Sonegawa-style totality argument.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_06_B5203; source_row=15711
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

24 months of qualifying public relations experience as of priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this issue de novo, finding the beneficiary's claim of qualifying experience with the petitioner since 2004 was inconsistent with USCIS records showing work authorization for the petitioner only from February 2009.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue de novo, finding the beneficiary's claim of qualifying experience with the petitioner since 2004 was inconsistent with USCIS records showing work authorization for the petitioner only from February 2009.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_06_B5203; source_row=15713
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIMaster’s

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets educational requirements of labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS is bound by the plain language of the ETA Form 9089. Because the petitioner checked 'no' to alternate fields of study, a bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering cannot satisfy the alternate combination requirement. The only credential evaluation concluding equivalency to a Master's in Computer Science improperly combined education with work experience, which is not permitted for EB-2 classification.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS is bound by the plain language of the ETA Form 9089. Because the petitioner checked 'no' to alternate fields of study, a bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering cannot satisfy the alternate combination requirement. The only credential evaluation concluding equivalency to a Master's in Computer Science improperly combined education with work experience, which is not permitted for EB-2 classification. BALCA decisions are not binding on USCIS.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_04_B5203; source_row=15706
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Possession of U.S. baccalaureate or foreign equivalent degree plus five years of progressive experience (alternative advanced degree standard)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found, beyond the director's decision, that even accepting counsel's argument the beneficiary still fails: the three-year Bachelor of Commerce and Post Graduate Diploma do not constitute a foreign equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree, and the documented work experience totals only about four years and three months from the certified employer, not the required five years.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found, beyond the director's decision, that even accepting counsel's argument the beneficiary still fails: the three-year Bachelor of Commerce and Post Graduate Diploma do not constitute a foreign equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree, and the documented work experience totals only about four years and three months from the certified employer, not the required five years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_03_B5203; source_row=15705
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Possession of U.S. master's degree or foreign equivalent as required by labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The labor certification plainly requires a master's degree; line 6 allows no combination of education or experience as an alternative, and H.14 'Kellogg' language cannot supersede the stated minimum. All three credential evaluations relied on combining lesser degrees and/or work experience, which produces only an 'equivalent' rather than a true foreign equivalent degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The labor certification plainly requires a master's degree; line 6 allows no combination of education or experience as an alternative, and H.14 'Kellogg' language cannot supersede the stated minimum. All three credential evaluations relied on combining lesser degrees and/or work experience, which produces only an 'equivalent' rather than a true foreign equivalent degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_03_B5203; source_row=15704
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Totality of circumstances (Sonegawa analysis)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO applied Sonegawa and found the petitioner failed to show significant historical growth, an uncharacteristic expenditure explaining the shortfall, or a sound business reputation comparable to the Sonegawa petitioner. The petitioner offered no evidence of company milestones or industry reputation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO applied Sonegawa and found the petitioner failed to show significant historical growth, an uncharacteristic expenditure explaining the shortfall, or a sound business reputation comparable to the Sonegawa petitioner. The petitioner offered no evidence of company milestones or industry reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-24_05_B5203; source_row=15710
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment