Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22141–22150
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded that local work in service of a national goal does not itself yield a benefit national in scope, and the petitioner did not show her work, by itself, benefits the United States as a whole.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that local work in service of a national goal does not itself yield a benefit national in scope, and the petitioner did not show her work, by itself, benefits the United States as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-23_01_B5203; source_row=15686 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found counsel made little effort to distinguish the petitioner from other qualified professionals in her field; certificates were not shown to be significant, witness letters did not show benefit beyond her classroom, and articles did not show she initiated reforms with national results.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found counsel made little effort to distinguish the petitioner from other qualified professionals in her field; certificates were not shown to be significant, witness letters did not show benefit beyond her classroom, and articles did not show she initiated reforms with national results.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-23_01_B5203; source_row=15687 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner's first place finish in an age-limited competition (under 15) was not reported in top international media and was not open to the petitioner's entire field, so it could not be considered one of the top awards in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner's first place finish in an age-limited competition (under 15) was not reported in top international media and was not open to the petitioner's entire field, so it could not be considered one of the top awards in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-22_02_B2203; source_row=15678 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO held that this criterion is generally limited to the visual arts. Because the petitioner performed in an athletic display or coached those who did, rather than creating tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases, she did not submit qualifying evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO held that this criterion is generally limited to the visual arts. Because the petitioner performed in an athletic display or coached those who did, rather than creating tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases, she did not submit qualifying evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-22_02_B2203; source_row=15682 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that expert letters asserting the petitioner's techniques were adopted by leading instructors lacked specificity—they did not name any instructors who adopted the techniques or provide corroborating documentary evidence. Even assuming one original contribution, the regulation requires contributions in the plural. Vague solicited letters without specific examples of field-wide impact are insufficient.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that expert letters asserting the petitioner's techniques were adopted by leading instructors lacked specificity—they did not name any instructors who adopted the techniques or provide corroborating documentary evidence. Even assuming one original contribution, the regulation requires contributions in the plural. Vague solicited letters without specific examples of field-wide impact are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-22_02_B2203; source_row=15681 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner claimed eligibility based on only one organization, but the regulation requires a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments in the plural. Additionally, the letter from the organization did not specify how the petitioner contributed to it in a significant way or what role she played in its activities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner claimed eligibility based on only one organization, but the regulation requires a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments in the plural. Additionally, the letter from the organization did not specify how the petitioner contributed to it in a significant way or what role she played in its activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-22_02_B2203; source_row=15683 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary qualifications – minimum education (master's degree or foreign equivalent)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The credential evaluations were unpersuasive because they did not compare the beneficiary's actual coursework to a U.S. master's program and were not peer-reviewed. The record also lacked an official academic record showing award of the degree, and inconsistencies between the university certificate and the controller of examinations letter raised authenticity concerns.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The credential evaluations were unpersuasive because they did not compare the beneficiary's actual coursework to a U.S. master's program and were not peer-reviewed. The record also lacked an official academic record showing award of the degree, and inconsistencies between the university certificate and the controller of examinations letter raised authenticity concerns.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-16_02_B5203; source_row=15674 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
job offer requires an advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the petitioner did not show what specific tasks could not be performed by an RN with a bachelor's degree or less, and the position is indistinguishable from an ordinary RN.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the petitioner did not show what specific tasks could not be performed by an RN with a bachelor's degree or less, and the position is indistinguishable from an ordinary RN.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=15676 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c