Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found no Sonegawa-type facts warranting a favorable totality-of-circumstances finding. Counsel's broad assertion of economic recession impact was unsupported by documentary evidence. Pending work contracts and anticipated future growth could not substitute for demonstrated ability as of the priority date. Unaudited financial statements were rejected as insufficient under the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found no Sonegawa-type facts warranting a favorable totality-of-circumstances finding. Counsel's broad assertion of economic recession impact was unsupported by documentary evidence. Pending work contracts and anticipated future growth could not substitute for demonstrated ability as of the priority date. Unaudited financial statements were rejected as insufficient under the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_05_B5203; source_row=15649 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 2009 Form 1065 showed net income of -$340,908 and net current assets of -$372,961, both insufficient. The AAO rejected each alternative argument: depreciation may not be added back; unaudited financial statements are not reliable; lines of credit are not available funds; bank statements are not enumerated evidence; anticipated income is speculative; and the petitioner did not establish that 2009 losses were uncharacteri…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2009 Form 1065 showed net income of -$340,908 and net current assets of -$372,961, both insufficient. The AAO rejected each alternative argument: depreciation may not be added back; unaudited financial statements are not reliable; lines of credit are not available funds; bank statements are not enumerated evidence; anticipated income is speculative; and the petitioner did not establish that 2009 losses were uncharacteristic. No facts paralleling the Sonegawa exception were shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_03_B5203; source_row=15645 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The employment letters submitted are internally contradictory, conflict with the beneficiary's own representations on the ETA Form 9089, and include unexplained overlapping employment periods. These unresolved inconsistencies render the letters unpersuasive, and the beneficiary's qualifying experience cannot be confirmed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employment letters submitted are internally contradictory, conflict with the beneficiary's own representations on the ETA Form 9089, and include unexplained overlapping employment periods. These unresolved inconsistencies render the letters unpersuasive, and the beneficiary's qualifying experience cannot be confirmed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_03_B5203; source_row=15644 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay the proffered wage since the priority date
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found the submitted 2011 tax return and officer affidavits sufficient to establish that the petitioner more likely than not has the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage of $130,000 since the priority date of May 27, 2011.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the submitted 2011 tax return and officer affidavits sufficient to establish that the petitioner more likely than not has the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage of $130,000 since the priority date of May 27, 2011.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_01_B5203; source_row=15636 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Counsel did not challenge the director's conclusion on appeal, so the AAO considered the issue abandoned. AAO also noted independently that the plain language requires plural 'prizes or awards' and a single award does not satisfy the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Counsel did not challenge the director's conclusion on appeal, so the AAO considered the issue abandoned. AAO also noted independently that the plain language requires plural 'prizes or awards' and a single award does not satisfy the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_02_B2203; source_row=15637 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why the evidence was persuasive
The petitioner's wages of $138,578 (2008) and $146,524 (2009) significantly exceeded the 90th percentile annualized wage of $101,878 for entertainers in Nevada, establishing qualifying evidence under this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's wages of $138,578 (2008) and $146,524 (2009) significantly exceeded the 90th percentile annualized wage of $101,878 for entertainers in Nevada, establishing qualifying evidence under this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_02_B2203; source_row=15642 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why the evidence was persuasive
The petitioner earned $145,293–$146,321 annually, significantly more than the annualized 90th percentile wage of $101,878 for entertainers in Nevada, satisfying the high salary criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner earned $145,293–$146,321 annually, significantly more than the annualized 90th percentile wage of $101,878 for entertainers in Nevada, satisfying the high salary criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-11_01_B2203; source_row=15634 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The tax documents did not establish the source of the income or show how much was salary versus other income, and the petitioner submitted no evidence that the beneficiary's earnings as an executive demonstrate exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The tax documents did not establish the source of the income or show how much was salary versus other income, and the petitioner submitted no evidence that the beneficiary's earnings as an executive demonstrate exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15626 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found on de novo review that merely holding an advanced degree is not the standard; the degree must be academically appropriate to the petitioned profession. The beneficiary's degrees in Education and Law were not shown to be required for or appropriate to her intended duties as a chief executive of a multi-service provider.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found on de novo review that merely holding an advanced degree is not the standard; the degree must be academically appropriate to the petitioned profession. The beneficiary's degrees in Education and Law were not shown to be required for or appropriate to her intended duties as a chief executive of a multi-service provider.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15622 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The four business corporations (MCI, FedEx, HP-Compaq, Xerox) are not professional associations; the petitioner's business arrangements with them are not memberships. Only one actual professional association was documented initially, and the regulation requires membership in more than one association.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The four business corporations (MCI, FedEx, HP-Compaq, Xerox) are not professional associations; the petitioner's business arrangements with them are not memberships. Only one actual professional association was documented initially, and the regulation requires membership in more than one association. The associate membership added in the RFE response was not shown to have existed at filing and did not require professional credentials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15627 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c