Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22211–22220
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner's work is in an area of intrinsic merit.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner's work is in an area of intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-09_01_B5203; source_row=15600 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's citation record showed only one independent cite and one self-cite, which was not indicative of notable influence on the field. The expert letters largely discussed future promise rather than demonstrated past impact. The patent applications were authored by the petitioner's father, not the petitioner.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's citation record showed only one independent cite and one self-cite, which was not indicative of notable influence on the field. The expert letters largely discussed future promise rather than demonstrated past impact. The patent applications were authored by the petitioner's father, not the petitioner. The letters of support came primarily from the petitioner's professors and institutional affiliates, and could not establish influence over the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-09_03_B5203; source_row=15615 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalFaculty
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded that witness letters offered general praise without documenting actual influence; the petitioner failed to submit citation evidence or other objective documentation of impact, and witnesses' speculation that citations would emerge in the future is insufficient because eligibility must be established as of the filing date.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that witness letters offered general praise without documenting actual influence; the petitioner failed to submit citation evidence or other objective documentation of impact, and witnesses' speculation that citations would emerge in the future is insufficient because eligibility must be established as of the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-09_04_B5203; source_row=15618 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's scenario was speculative, using the word 'might' twice when predicting results, and no evidence showed the strategy had proven effective.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's scenario was speculative, using the word 'might' twice when predicting results, and no evidence showed the strategy had proven effective.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=15590 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters on motion did not show the petitioner was engaged in ongoing, influential HIV/AIDS work as of the filing date; they showed only future plans still in embryonic stages years after the filing.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The letters on motion did not show the petitioner was engaged in ongoing, influential HIV/AIDS work as of the filing date; they showed only future plans still in embryonic stages years after the filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=15591 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found pervasive credibility problems: HIV/AIDS was emphasized in the petitioner's work only in immigration filings, while employer public materials focused on entirely unrelated missions. New submissions on motion were post-dated and speculative.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found pervasive credibility problems: HIV/AIDS was emphasized in the petitioner's work only in immigration filings, while employer public materials focused on entirely unrelated missions. New submissions on motion were post-dated and speculative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=15589 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to document past employment and contributions setting him apart from others in the field. A job offer letter and a list of seven roles, without supporting employer letters or evidence of influence on the field, were insufficient. The petitioner's reliance on the importance of his specialization and on unpublished decisions was unavailing.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to document past employment and contributions setting him apart from others in the field. A job offer letter and a list of seven roles, without supporting employer letters or evidence of influence on the field, were insufficient. The petitioner's reliance on the importance of his specialization and on unpublished decisions was unavailing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-28_01_B5203; source_row=15588 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c