Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 22261–22270

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner established the leading or critical role criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner established the leading or critical role criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_05_B2203; source_row=15563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

What the decision said

Although the petitioner submitted membership-related evidence on appeal, she did not specifically challenge the director's adverse finding, so AAO deemed the claim abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the petitioner submitted membership-related evidence on appeal, she did not specifically challenge the director's adverse finding, so AAO deemed the claim abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_05_B2203; source_row=15560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPostdoctoral Researcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why the evidence was persuasive

The director found the criterion met, and the documentary evidence supports the finding that the petitioner satisfied the regulatory requirements.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The director found the criterion met, and the documentary evidence supports the finding that the petitioner satisfied the regulatory requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_04_B2203; source_row=15555
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

There is no evidence the petitioner originated the mezzotint method, and skill alone is not the basis of this classification. Letters describing her article, awards, and exhibitions do not show impact on the field beyond a single classroom or presenting venue, and authorship/awards/display fall under separate criteria.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
There is no evidence the petitioner originated the mezzotint method, and skill alone is not the basis of this classification. Letters describing her article, awards, and exhibitions do not show impact on the field beyond a single classroom or presenting venue, and authorship/awards/display fall under separate criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_01_B2203; source_row=15525
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO reaffirms its prior appellate finding that the petitioner's evidence meets the display criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirms its prior appellate finding that the petitioner's evidence meets the display criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_01_B2203; source_row=15527
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManagerPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's properly submitted evidence contained little to distinguish him from his peers in the voter participation area. He provided no figures showing how many targeted voters actually voted, no data demonstrating he was more successful than other organizers, and no evidence that his interim state directorship at MFV established a national model.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's properly submitted evidence contained little to distinguish him from his peers in the voter participation area. He provided no figures showing how many targeted voters actually voted, no data demonstrating he was more successful than other organizers, and no evidence that his interim state directorship at MFV established a national model. The petitioner's subjective witness praise did not establish past demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_02_B5203; source_row=15538
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManagerPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

What the decision said

The AAO did not separately resolve this prong, focusing its denial on the third prong (national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker) and the advanced degree qualification issue.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately resolve this prong, focusing its denial on the third prong (national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker) and the advanced degree qualification issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_02_B5203; source_row=15536
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManagerPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

What the decision said

The AAO noted counsel's national-scope argument but did not resolve it as a standalone prong, instead folding it into the broader finding that the petitioner had not shown his work established a national model.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO noted counsel's national-scope argument but did not resolve it as a standalone prong, instead folding it into the broader finding that the petitioner had not shown his work established a national model.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_02_B5203; source_row=15537
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO affirmed the director's favorable determination for this criterion without further elaboration.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO affirmed the director's favorable determination for this criterion without further elaboration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_03_B2203; source_row=15543
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / Energy

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the petitioner satisfied the second prong (national scope) in prior proceedings. Not re-litigated in this motion.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner satisfied the second prong (national scope) in prior proceedings. Not re-litigated in this motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-21_03_B5203; source_row=15549
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment