Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 22311–22320
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot established
Case facts
EconomicsPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO withdrew the director's finding. The petitioner failed to submit primary evidence of salary (payroll records, paystubs, tax documents) and the letters from her own company and father were not sworn affidavits. The comparative salary data did not properly compare her salary to others in her specific field, and foreign-language documents lacked certified translations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding. The petitioner failed to submit primary evidence of salary (payroll records, paystubs, tax documents) and the letters from her own company and father were not sworn affidavits. The comparative salary data did not properly compare her salary to others in her specific field, and foreign-language documents lacked certified translations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=15478 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The regulation requires documentation of the alien's own receipt of prizes or awards. Documents addressed to the petitioner's father or his companies do not demonstrate the petitioner's individual receipt of such awards. One letter post-dated the petition filing and could not be considered; moreover, it was only a letter of thanks, not a prize or award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The regulation requires documentation of the alien's own receipt of prizes or awards. Documents addressed to the petitioner's father or his companies do not demonstrate the petitioner's individual receipt of such awards. One letter post-dated the petition filing and could not be considered; moreover, it was only a letter of thanks, not a prize or award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=15473 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
EconomicsPhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AS system was only applied at the petitioner's own company, and a referenced expert letter speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating current major significance. NTFIS was also shown to be used only within the petitioner's company. The book was not shown to have been widely applied or implemented in the field beyond the petitioner's company.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AS system was only applied at the petitioner's own company, and a referenced expert letter speculated about future impact rather than demonstrating current major significance. NTFIS was also shown to be used only within the petitioner's company. The book was not shown to have been widely applied or implemented in the field beyond the petitioner's company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=15476 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
For TCA, INTES, and a third association, only company memberships were demonstrated, not individual memberships. For TUSIAD, while the petitioner showed individual membership, she failed to demonstrate that TUSIAD requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. Additionally, demonstrating membership in only one association is insufficient given the regulatory use of the plural.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
For TCA, INTES, and a third association, only company memberships were demonstrated, not individual memberships. For TUSIAD, while the petitioner showed individual membership, she failed to demonstrate that TUSIAD requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. Additionally, demonstrating membership in only one association is insufficient given the regulatory use of the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=15474 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The regulation requires formal participation as a judge either on a panel or individually. Simply signing contracts on behalf of the petitioner's company does not demonstrate formal judging. No documentation was actually submitted for the last project referenced by counsel.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The regulation requires formal participation as a judge either on a panel or individually. Simply signing contracts on behalf of the petitioner's company does not demonstrate formal judging. No documentation was actually submitted for the last project referenced by counsel.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=15475 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the petitioner's 2011 tax return and paycheck statements established the petitioner's ability to pay the difference between wages actually paid and the full proffered wage of $78,603.00, satisfying the continuing ability-to-pay requirement since the priority date of March 21, 2011.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's 2011 tax return and paycheck statements established the petitioner's ability to pay the difference between wages actually paid and the full proffered wage of $78,603.00, satisfying the continuing ability-to-pay requirement since the priority date of March 21, 2011.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_03_B5203; source_row=15472 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's foreign education equivalent to U.S. master's degree as required by labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the evaluations unpersuasive and conflicting, noted none were peer-reviewed, and gave preference to AACRAO's EDGE database, which equates an Indian three-year B.Sc. to two-to-three years of U.S. university study and an Indian M.Sc. to a U.S. bachelor's.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evaluations unpersuasive and conflicting, noted none were peer-reviewed, and gave preference to AACRAO's EDGE database, which equates an Indian three-year B.Sc. to two-to-three years of U.S. university study and an Indian M.Sc. to a U.S. bachelor's.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_07_B5203; source_row=15483 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of experience in architectural field per labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO concluded that the beneficiary's master's degree in architecture and five years of work experience in jobs related to architecture satisfied the ETA Form 9089 requirements when Parts H.4 and H.10 are read in combination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO concluded that the beneficiary's master's degree in architecture and five years of work experience in jobs related to architecture satisfied the ETA Form 9089 requirements when Parts H.4 and H.10 are read in combination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_02_B5203; source_row=15471 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating receipt of two lesser nationally recognized prizes for excellence, minimally meeting the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence demonstrating receipt of two lesser nationally recognized prizes for excellence, minimally meeting the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_02_B2203; source_row=15463 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO reviewed the record and found sufficient documentary evidence to minimally meet the plain language of the regulation, concurring with the director.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reviewed the record and found sufficient documentary evidence to minimally meet the plain language of the regulation, concurring with the director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-12-18_02_B2203; source_row=15466 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c