Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO accepted the explanation that the beneficiary's affiliation with other companies was as a point of contact and did not negate the bona fides of the job offer.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted the explanation that the beneficiary's affiliation with other companies was as a point of contact and did not negate the bona fides of the job offer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-09_01_B5203; source_row=15383 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's qualifying work experience per labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO reviewed the entire record including the NOIR response documentation and concluded the beneficiary more likely than not possessed the required experience as of the priority date. The director's blanket disregard of all alternative evidence without analysis was error.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO reviewed the entire record including the NOIR response documentation and concluded the beneficiary more likely than not possessed the required experience as of the priority date. The director's blanket disregard of all alternative evidence without analysis was error.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-08_01_B5203; source_row=15380 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the reference letters were primarily from local colleagues and contained bare, conclusory assertions without specific examples of major significance; the pending unpublished book could not be gauged for impact; the ACTFL conference presentation lacked evidence of original research or subsequent field adoption; and the 5Cs and state curriculum standards were pre-existing, with no showing that the petitione…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the reference letters were primarily from local colleagues and contained bare, conclusory assertions without specific examples of major significance; the pending unpublished book could not be gauged for impact; the ACTFL conference presentation lacked evidence of original research or subsequent field adoption; and the 5Cs and state curriculum standards were pre-existing, with no showing that the petitioner's integration method was original or influential.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_07_B2203; source_row=15365 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that while peer reviewing manuscripts can qualify as judging, the letter attesting to that role postdated the April 12, 2011 filing date and did not state that the duties were performed prior to filing; the petitioner also abandoned her original evidence (the speech contest) by failing to contest the director's RFE finding.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while peer reviewing manuscripts can qualify as judging, the letter attesting to that role postdated the April 12, 2011 filing date and did not state that the duties were performed prior to filing; the petitioner also abandoned her original evidence (the speech contest) by failing to contest the director's RFE finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_07_B2203; source_row=15364 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner failed to establish that the materials submitted were from the same publication she claimed, the AAO declined to rely on the publisher's self-promotional attestation that it was an academic journal, and the materials appeared to be individual language lessons rather than scholarly articles.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to establish that the materials submitted were from the same publication she claimed, the AAO declined to rely on the publisher's self-promotional attestation that it was an academic journal, and the materials appeared to be individual language lessons rather than scholarly articles.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_07_B2203; source_row=15366 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record lacked evidence of the award's criteria and judges' expertise to establish it was for excellence in medicine rather than recognition of a commitment to freedom and peace through medicine. Additionally, the regulation requires prizes or awards in the plural, and the petitioner only submitted one qualifying award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record lacked evidence of the award's criteria and judges' expertise to establish it was for excellence in medicine rather than recognition of a commitment to freedom and peace through medicine. Additionally, the regulation requires prizes or awards in the plural, and the petitioner only submitted one qualifying award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_10_B2203; source_row=15374 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found no documentary evidence to support the petitioner's claim of curing a Parkinson's patient, no evidence that his findings were reproduced and confirmed by other experts, and the reference letters were conclusory without corroborating documentation. The petitioner's ability to perform traditional acupuncture therapy is neither original nor a contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found no documentary evidence to support the petitioner's claim of curing a Parkinson's patient, no evidence that his findings were reproduced and confirmed by other experts, and the reference letters were conclusory without corroborating documentation. The petitioner's ability to perform traditional acupuncture therapy is neither original nor a contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_10_B2203; source_row=15377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner did not claim to be a judge in her original submission, only raising this in the RFE response. Running auditions is insufficient to show formal judging participation. The only supporting letter was too ambiguous to establish that the petitioner served as a formal judge.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not claim to be a judge in her original submission, only raising this in the RFE response. Running auditions is insufficient to show formal judging participation. The only supporting letter was too ambiguous to establish that the petitioner served as a formal judge.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_05_B2203; source_row=15352 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to establish she received the claimed awards because photos did not bear her name, the supporting letter only stated she competed but not that she won, and the internet sources were not reliable or contemporaneous. Even considering the evidence cumulatively, it failed to establish national or international recognition of the prizes.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to establish she received the claimed awards because photos did not bear her name, the supporting letter only stated she competed but not that she won, and the internet sources were not reliable or contemporaneous. Even considering the evidence cumulatively, it failed to establish national or international recognition of the prizes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-11-03_05_B2203; source_row=15350 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c